barcelonic29 -
You are absolutely incredible. You seem to think that it is I who has misunderstood your arguments. I haven't. Amongst many others, I understand your argument in which you state that, “... you'll note Person 2 is not IMPLYING Person A prefers meat to veg...” etc. I have no problem with its internal logic but the whole thing simply isn't analogous to the arguments that others have been presenting, hence it is a 'straw man'.
I find this statement puzzling, “... To hear you speak of logic is laughable Birdie when you've misread from the start, you cannot understand basic analogies and you affix me the label 'straw man' simply for using one...”
I didn't call you a 'straw man' for using an analogy. I didn't call you a 'straw man' at all. Clearly, you do not understand what a 'straw man' is...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
As for me irritating you, I can't help it if your arguments are weak and you take objection to that fact being pointed out. And as for me lacking tact, please review your own posts for examples of copious amounts of insults and snide remarks.