Motoring5 mins ago
Does Richard Littlejohn have a point?
For an illegal immigrant to enter the UK an Aghanistan has to travel through at least 8 countries (as the crow flies) before he gets to the UK. So should the castegory of asylum seeker be erased from the book when they could have applied for asylum in one of those countries.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by pdq1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.This is what's been said for years - to claim genuine asylum, you should claim it in the first place of safety you come to.
Most of the people who are waiting on the other side of the Channel to come in here at Dover could have claimed asylum in several other countries - but they're not asylum seekers, they are economic migrants, every time they are interviewed they say they want to get a job, get married, and settle down here.
Most of the people who are waiting on the other side of the Channel to come in here at Dover could have claimed asylum in several other countries - but they're not asylum seekers, they are economic migrants, every time they are interviewed they say they want to get a job, get married, and settle down here.
-- answer removed --
"What has the number of countries their journey passes throught got to do with anything" - it depends on any of them being EU countries.
It is EU law that the first EU Member State entered is responsible for processing the asylum claim and allows the UK to transfer asylum seekers back to that point of entry within 12 months. However, implementation of the Dublin Convention and the Dublin Regulation has failed to adequately control Asylum Shopping since 1997.
http:// en.wiki pedia.o ...iki/ Dublin_ Convent ion
It is EU law that the first EU Member State entered is responsible for processing the asylum claim and allows the UK to transfer asylum seekers back to that point of entry within 12 months. However, implementation of the Dublin Convention and the Dublin Regulation has failed to adequately control Asylum Shopping since 1997.
http://
why if these people have money to get from their native country, often thousands of pounds, don't they use that to make a better life for themselves where they were born. I reckon the main reason for coming to Britain has nothing to do with being fond of us, more that once here they can't be got rid off. With a more than generous benefit system they head here, i don't understand this system.
almost every council, housing office, CAB, has notices printed in many languages. The last time i was in CAB, one notice was printed in over 50 languages, why is that necessary. And interpreters have to be on hand, or called in when it is necessary to translate for those lining up to get advice on benefits, housing, schools, you name it.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.