Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
An attack of heterosexuality
Yes, you heard it right.
It would appear that this couple have been split up because they are a straight married couple, whereas in fact, they have been barred from sharing a room in the Olympic village because there are designated female accommodation and designated male.
However, it would appear that there are 'dozens' of gay athletes for whom this doesn't apply, because...well, because they are the same sex.
Interesting point - according to the chap, there are 'tons of gay couples on the Australian Olympic team'
Who'd have thought eh?
Is this really an attack on heterosexuals? Or has this story been spun out of the need to provide more fuel for the 'PC fire'?
http:// www.dai lymail. ...uple s-share -beds.h tml
It would appear that this couple have been split up because they are a straight married couple, whereas in fact, they have been barred from sharing a room in the Olympic village because there are designated female accommodation and designated male.
However, it would appear that there are 'dozens' of gay athletes for whom this doesn't apply, because...well, because they are the same sex.
Interesting point - according to the chap, there are 'tons of gay couples on the Australian Olympic team'
Who'd have thought eh?
Is this really an attack on heterosexuals? Or has this story been spun out of the need to provide more fuel for the 'PC fire'?
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.AOG - you really do need to lighten up!
Seriously - I was genuinley being light-hearted with my initial comment - it appears you took me seriously - no problem.
I was not being at all insulting - as my posts show, and I am certainly not going to get into a slanging match about this.
Let's move on shall we.
Seriously - I was genuinley being light-hearted with my initial comment - it appears you took me seriously - no problem.
I was not being at all insulting - as my posts show, and I am certainly not going to get into a slanging match about this.
Let's move on shall we.
// Seriously - I was genuinley being light-hearted with my initial comment - it appears you took me seriously - no problem.
I was not being at all insulting - [as my posts show], and I am certainly not going to get into a slanging match about this.
Let's move on shall we. //
Once again andy, I can't help thinking if only John Terry had used these exact words to Anton Ferdinand, alot of trouble could have been avoided.
I was not being at all insulting - [as my posts show], and I am certainly not going to get into a slanging match about this.
Let's move on shall we. //
Once again andy, I can't help thinking if only John Terry had used these exact words to Anton Ferdinand, alot of trouble could have been avoided.
Indeed ludwig!
Perhaps Mr Terry and I approach potential arguments differently.
I will certainly fight my corner if I believe I am right, but if it is a simply misunderstanding, surely it is better to be adult about it, realise it for what it is, and move on.
I think Mr Terry is rather more pugnacious than I - maybe it comes with being a sportsman - or a Chelsea player (I'm kidding!!!!!!)
Perhaps Mr Terry and I approach potential arguments differently.
I will certainly fight my corner if I believe I am right, but if it is a simply misunderstanding, surely it is better to be adult about it, realise it for what it is, and move on.
I think Mr Terry is rather more pugnacious than I - maybe it comes with being a sportsman - or a Chelsea player (I'm kidding!!!!!!)
andy-hughes
/// Oh ha ha AOG, let me hold my sides less they split! ////
/// It is 2012 you know - such puerile humour was left behind in the playground about 1978. ///
This is your initial comment, read it through again, do you seriously think this was in any way you were genuinely being light-hearted?
This was completely out of the blue, we had not previously had any exchanges, so why did you find the need to be so provocative in the first place?
Had you had said this to a friend who had just made a jovial remark not involving you whatsoever, would you have also expected him to brush it off also?
You later stated that you will certainly fight your corner, so please allow me the privilege of fighting my corner also.
/// Oh ha ha AOG, let me hold my sides less they split! ////
/// It is 2012 you know - such puerile humour was left behind in the playground about 1978. ///
This is your initial comment, read it through again, do you seriously think this was in any way you were genuinely being light-hearted?
This was completely out of the blue, we had not previously had any exchanges, so why did you find the need to be so provocative in the first place?
Had you had said this to a friend who had just made a jovial remark not involving you whatsoever, would you have also expected him to brush it off also?
You later stated that you will certainly fight your corner, so please allow me the privilege of fighting my corner also.
AOG
I think you meant 'humourless'?
As I have previously explained, this story seems to be without merit, and because of that I believe it warrants discussion. You yourself saw value in discussing the story, but left it to me (for which I thank you).
Rather than focussing on my (admittedly biased) reasons for highlighting the story, I'd be interested in your opinion of the story itself.
Do you think this is a deliberate case of 'one rule for them' or simply a quirk of logistics?
I think you meant 'humourless'?
As I have previously explained, this story seems to be without merit, and because of that I believe it warrants discussion. You yourself saw value in discussing the story, but left it to me (for which I thank you).
Rather than focussing on my (admittedly biased) reasons for highlighting the story, I'd be interested in your opinion of the story itself.
Do you think this is a deliberate case of 'one rule for them' or simply a quirk of logistics?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.