Quizzes & Puzzles6 mins ago
Would they have dared to have done this, had they been gay?
72 Answers
http://
The Email that was accidentally sent to the 'Bride To BE' read:
/// ‘Hi Carlo, I need your advice on this wedding, I know this probably doesn’t sound very nice, but I am trying to put this wedding off as I don’t think they are the type of people that we would want to have at Stoke Park.’ ///
The Email that was accidentally sent to the 'Bride To BE' read:
/// ‘Hi Carlo, I need your advice on this wedding, I know this probably doesn’t sound very nice, but I am trying to put this wedding off as I don’t think they are the type of people that we would want to have at Stoke Park.’ ///
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
andy-hughes
/// trig - AOG doesn't normally hit the site until after lunch, and he is usually gone by tea-time - so hold on, he'll be here. ///
Yes I am here but, I won't carry on debating with those who only debate on issues they agree with, enough to say that most of the 'Sheep' huddled together over the Gay B&B story, which speaks volumes for their hypocritical views.
By the way Andy I see you are still cuddling up to JTH on these cold autumn days, but where was she when you needed a little support over your unpopular 'So' thread?
But unlike me who is a rather 'one man guy' I don't chicken out from facing my adversaries.
/// trig - AOG doesn't normally hit the site until after lunch, and he is usually gone by tea-time - so hold on, he'll be here. ///
Yes I am here but, I won't carry on debating with those who only debate on issues they agree with, enough to say that most of the 'Sheep' huddled together over the Gay B&B story, which speaks volumes for their hypocritical views.
By the way Andy I see you are still cuddling up to JTH on these cold autumn days, but where was she when you needed a little support over your unpopular 'So' thread?
But unlike me who is a rather 'one man guy' I don't chicken out from facing my adversaries.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
AOG
You asked 'Would They Have Dared To Have Done This, Had They Been Gay?'
lil_billym has provided you with a link indicating that the venue advertises itself as one for civil partnerships. Which is a post you have completely ignored, presumably because it clashes with your 'everybody has it in for me/is a member of the PC conspiracy' worldview.
It's very admirable to have your own thoughts, AOG. Everyone should. Nobody should follow the crowd just for the sake of following the crowd. But I'd put it to you that everyone should hold their opinions to the standards of reason and whether they make sense or not. Which is something I've yet to see any evidence that you have ever done.
It's easy to say you disagree with lots of other people - and pose yourself as some kind of free thinker.
Anyone can do that, AOG. A 12-year-old can do that. Disagreeing with something just because other people think it is no less irrational than agreeing with something just because everyone else thinks it.
What's hard is explaining why everyone else is mistaken in a way that is intellectually credible. That's what a real 'free thinker' does. That's the mark of genuine insight, intelligence, and moral courage. And based on your tenure at AB, I don't think that's a challenge you're capable of facing. To my mind, this thread is a small addition to the mountain of evidence to that effect.
You asked 'Would They Have Dared To Have Done This, Had They Been Gay?'
lil_billym has provided you with a link indicating that the venue advertises itself as one for civil partnerships. Which is a post you have completely ignored, presumably because it clashes with your 'everybody has it in for me/is a member of the PC conspiracy' worldview.
It's very admirable to have your own thoughts, AOG. Everyone should. Nobody should follow the crowd just for the sake of following the crowd. But I'd put it to you that everyone should hold their opinions to the standards of reason and whether they make sense or not. Which is something I've yet to see any evidence that you have ever done.
It's easy to say you disagree with lots of other people - and pose yourself as some kind of free thinker.
Anyone can do that, AOG. A 12-year-old can do that. Disagreeing with something just because other people think it is no less irrational than agreeing with something just because everyone else thinks it.
What's hard is explaining why everyone else is mistaken in a way that is intellectually credible. That's what a real 'free thinker' does. That's the mark of genuine insight, intelligence, and moral courage. And based on your tenure at AB, I don't think that's a challenge you're capable of facing. To my mind, this thread is a small addition to the mountain of evidence to that effect.
Kromovaracun
/// What's hard is explaining why everyone else is mistaken in a way that is intellectually credible. That's what a real 'free thinker' does. That's the mark of genuine insight, intelligence, and moral courage. ///
Explaining that is very simple to do on this site, because it is never a level playing field simply because it is overwhelmingly occupied by 'Left' thinking individuals.
Those words of yours:
"EVERYONE ELSE IS MISTAKEN IN A WAY THAT IS INTELLECTUALLY CREDIBLE",
are a typical example of the arrogance of the 'Left', who constantly assume that it is only their views that are the ones that are intellectually credible.
/// What's hard is explaining why everyone else is mistaken in a way that is intellectually credible. That's what a real 'free thinker' does. That's the mark of genuine insight, intelligence, and moral courage. ///
Explaining that is very simple to do on this site, because it is never a level playing field simply because it is overwhelmingly occupied by 'Left' thinking individuals.
Those words of yours:
"EVERYONE ELSE IS MISTAKEN IN A WAY THAT IS INTELLECTUALLY CREDIBLE",
are a typical example of the arrogance of the 'Left', who constantly assume that it is only their views that are the ones that are intellectually credible.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.