Film, Media & TV2 mins ago
What is your stance on drugs? Should we legalise/control them or not?
I was reading and came across this
http:// uk.news .yahoo. ...bann ed-0119 19288.h tml
I've done some research and these legal highs the kids are taking can be pretty lethal and no one knows the long term effects of them, one i was reading about even brings on Parkinsons disease!
In Holland and Portugal i believe that casual drug laws have made crime figures decrease so should we adopt a more liberal stance?
Should we legalise them so that our kids can safely do drugs where they know exactly what's in it, know the dosage and cut out the evil drug dealing middlemen?
I would prefer my kids to buy clean drugs from the government rather then off some shady criminal in a dangerous area where they could be taking a lethal cocktail, wouldn't you?
(By kids i don't mean children)
http://
I've done some research and these legal highs the kids are taking can be pretty lethal and no one knows the long term effects of them, one i was reading about even brings on Parkinsons disease!
In Holland and Portugal i believe that casual drug laws have made crime figures decrease so should we adopt a more liberal stance?
Should we legalise them so that our kids can safely do drugs where they know exactly what's in it, know the dosage and cut out the evil drug dealing middlemen?
I would prefer my kids to buy clean drugs from the government rather then off some shady criminal in a dangerous area where they could be taking a lethal cocktail, wouldn't you?
(By kids i don't mean children)
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Froozy. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.There's a saying isn't there?
Keep doing what you're doing and keep getting the results you're getting
So our current strategy will:
increase drugs availability, cause increased deaths through product contamination, immeasurable death and destruction from criminal activity and growing prosperity for cartels and gangster distributors
Keep doing what you're doing and keep getting the results you're getting
So our current strategy will:
increase drugs availability, cause increased deaths through product contamination, immeasurable death and destruction from criminal activity and growing prosperity for cartels and gangster distributors
As it currently stands, drugs presents society with a massive, ongoing, tragic problem - it promotes serious crime, it promotes drug lords and massive profits, and it promotes addiction and squalor.
I would far rather exchange those sets of largely insoluble and incredibly expensive problems with the other set of problems that legalising the drugs would have - namely, how to cope with those people who misuse them, or overdose on them etc.
I would apply the same logic to prostitution, for similar reasons.
The war on drugs and eliiminating prostitution are both losing positions. We should recognise that and amend the law accordingly.
Unfortunately, I do not think any mainstream party is likely to take up these issues, because they are perceived as vote losers, and that seems a shame to me.Successive governments have struggled to find an evidence based coherent strategy for drugs - look what happened to Prof. David Knutt when he offered the evidence - and successive governments could be viewed as hypocritical for legalising alcohol and tobacco, whilst outlawing others.
I would far rather exchange those sets of largely insoluble and incredibly expensive problems with the other set of problems that legalising the drugs would have - namely, how to cope with those people who misuse them, or overdose on them etc.
I would apply the same logic to prostitution, for similar reasons.
The war on drugs and eliiminating prostitution are both losing positions. We should recognise that and amend the law accordingly.
Unfortunately, I do not think any mainstream party is likely to take up these issues, because they are perceived as vote losers, and that seems a shame to me.Successive governments have struggled to find an evidence based coherent strategy for drugs - look what happened to Prof. David Knutt when he offered the evidence - and successive governments could be viewed as hypocritical for legalising alcohol and tobacco, whilst outlawing others.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.