Is the mailOnline slacking?

[Mick-Talbot]

I don't read it , so I might have missed it but has there been an oversight on this story ?

http://news.sky.com/story/1014065/on-the-run-james-allen-guilty-of-two-murders


I put the name of this Savage in search and it can up with this from April.

http://news.sky.com/story/1014065/on-the-run-james-allen-guilty-of-two-murders

[emmie]

i don't read the online paper, but do usually buy a copy. I haven't looked at today's as yet.

[anotheoldgit]

Mick-Talbot

Er? If you never read it, you were bound to miss it, so there has been no oversight of this story as you suggest.

It takes very little skill to try and prove one's suggestions before one posts.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2235909/James-Allen-Double-killer-beat-81-year-old-death-stabbing-woman-jailed-37-years.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

Incidentally it is little wonder that only that came up when you entered 'Savage' in your search engine.

[anotheoldgit]

Incidentally it is a wonder that only that came up when you entered 'Savage' in your search engine.

[Baldric]

MT did not enter 'Savage' as you state aog, he says he put 'the name of this savage' in search

[dotty.]

i'm confused, the 2 links you've posted mick look the same to me

[Mick-Talbot]

Okay, where should I start.

"I put the name of this Savage in search"

Which means .... I put 'James Allen' in search (because that is his name...)

The mailonline's 'search' facility must be crap.



And finally if it was in why didn't attract your attention AOG?
After all . why miss an opportunity to type the word 'Savage ?

[Baldric]

Attention to de tail aog!

[mccfluff]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?sel=site&searchPhrase=james+allen

if i put james allen into the mail serch function, i get this

[Mick-Talbot]

That is a link from April. fluff......shody

[anotheoldgit]

mccfluff
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?sel=site&searchPhrase=james+allen

/// if i put james allen into the mail serch function, i get this ///

And then if one selects 'Most Recent' one gets the most up to date story.

[anotheoldgit]

Mick-Talbot

And if one types James Allen in the goggle search Engine, one can have the full selection of stories appertaining to James Allen.

So easy when you know how.

Must admit though I did previously misread your referenced to the word savage.

But it is strange how you can call a criminal a 'savage' and not get chastised for doing so, yet if I do likewise then all hell it let loose, I wonder why?

[anotheoldgit]

Mick-Talbot

/// The mailonline's 'search' facility must be crap. ///

Now what is that saying?

'A bad workman blames his tools'?

[Mick-Talbot]

AOG ... I believe it is 'Google'

But it is strange how you can call a criminal a 'savage' and not get chastised for doing so


Isn't he a savage?

I am surprised this horrific story wasn't covered by one of you newscasters.........

[anotheoldgit]

Mick-Talbot

/// AOG ... I believe it is 'Google' ///

Before turning into a AB spell checker, first check your typing is also correct.

/// I am surprised this horrific story wasn't covered by one of you newscasters......... /// ??????????????????

[anotheoldgit]

triggerhippy

http://us.cdn2.123rf.com/168nwm/liusa/liusa1106/liusa110600006/9849772-bird-an-eagle.jpg

[Mick-Talbot]

Well I have now spotted the

Most Recent
Oldest
Relevance

Options, surely the most recent should also be the most relevant?


I'm still surprised you didn't bring this story to the attention of your adoring public. Heinous crime by a odious individ.....oh Sugar I do apologise AOG.....I have missed the blooming obvious ....silly me, why would this story interest you.. tut!

[Mick-Talbot]

I am surprised this horrific story wasn't covered by one of you newscasters


Which word or words?

[ummmm]

*your

I think that's what he means.