/// Among the 118 is gay MP Conor Burns. He said he ‘marvels’ at why David Cameron is prioritising same-sex marriage when there is no ‘clamour’ for it in the gay community. ///
The 118 Tory MPs who are set to defy Cameron are listed here.
It's interesting that Mr Cameron (whom I believe once briefly held the position of Prime Minister) has made this a matter of priority. However, his continued promises of "rewarding marriage" which he made both before and after the last General Election seemed to have been quietly shifted to the back burner (if they're still on the hob at all). It's possibly...
Gay marriages, and denying prisoners the right to exercise their franchise, are probably important issues to those involved. But why are they on the top of Cameron's agenda? Has he nothing more important to occupy himself with?
/// Oh, and MP Conor Burns is talking cobblers. ///
If one doesn't toe the gay's line on the subject of gay marriages, they are talking 'cobblers', regardless of the fact that, that person also happens to be gay.
That kind of dictatorial thinking only turns people away from supporting the gay lobby.
We have discussed polls, and wisely decided that polls cannot be relied upon, since they are often biased.
What has not been discussed much in this thread at least is exactly why these 118 MPs are revolting?
What is it about the idea of gay marriage, precisely, that these MPs and other like minded individuals find so offensive that they feel impelled to vocally object, or vote against it?
Yes, sorry sp, I should have completed it more fully. Let me do so now:
Might not matter to you but ... neither does it to the vast majority of people as there are far more important issues to address which do matter to them. And when time and resources are tight it is morally reprehensible to spend valuable time fannying about with issues that only a small minority are interested in.
Since when has politics and legislation been solely been introduced and ranked according to its popularity, or its economic importance? You know better than that NJ. Nor is politics about monovalent decision making - focusing on just one thing at a time to the exclusion of everything else. Even politicians and lawmakers should be capable of some degree of multi-tasking :)
Some legislation might have been bubbling under for some while, and speaks to some basic cultural requirements - and gay marriage fits that bill. So why are these 118 MPs especially revolting?
Conor Burns IS talking cobblers, because there is strong support for marriage equality amongst gay people. Polls held in Attitude magazine, Gay Time and on the Pink News site all confirm this.
These are facts that I can back up with stats...so when Conor Burns says that there is little support for marriage equality in the gay community, he's talking cobblers.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.