I hope you don't imagine, Inf, that I'm going to read all these links...I do have a 'real' life as well, you know!
As for his 'alleged' offences, we all know for a 'certainty' that he is guilty of, at the very least, 'receiving' stolen American property (diplomatic cables etc)...ie he's a fence. There is also a belief among some Americans that he may have suborned Bradley Manning, so that MAY well be an additional crime he has to answer in the States, I don't know.
As regards British law, he's also a criminal, given that the breaking of bail condiditons is an offence. Every single level of our judiciary decided he should be extradited to Sweden having heard hs case against that. That country too, appears to believe that he has a legal case to answer and he is avoiding that by skulking where he is skulking. His theory of further "extraordinary rendition" is just that, a self-protective theory, nothing more.
In other words, at least three sovereign countries believe he needs to face questioning and possibly arrest and charging.
I agree with them, so - as you suggest - I'm "not too keen on him." I should add that I have no intention of getting involved here in a drawn-out debate on any of the above...been there, done that, end of!