News2 mins ago
There's us, and there's them . . .
A prominent peer rented accommodation in London when attending Westminster. The peer claimed a total of £29,675 for accommodation, at a time when the maximum daily accommodation claim was £165 a day. The bill represents a claim at the maximum possible rate for 179 days - (and here is the crunch) - more days than the Lords actually sat that year.
Why should they do that? Because they can.
Why should they do that? Because they can.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sir.prize. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Would this be Baroness Udin, Sirprize? If so, I think she was investigated by the standards committee and has been asked to repay £120,000.
Totally agree with you that some of the MPs and Lords totally abused the system, some very creatively.
I am sure I read somewhere that one reason that the expenses system was so lacking in audits and checks was because it was felt that MPs and Lords were more honourable than your average citizen, and that therefore to audit them represented a kind of insult!
I just find it disappointing that, despite evidence of wide-spread abuse of the previous system, the newly imposed and stricter system seems to have found very little in the way of savings on the expenses budget.....
Totally agree with you that some of the MPs and Lords totally abused the system, some very creatively.
I am sure I read somewhere that one reason that the expenses system was so lacking in audits and checks was because it was felt that MPs and Lords were more honourable than your average citizen, and that therefore to audit them represented a kind of insult!
I just find it disappointing that, despite evidence of wide-spread abuse of the previous system, the newly imposed and stricter system seems to have found very little in the way of savings on the expenses budget.....