Is Labour Starting To Abolish Democracy...
News1 min ago
Jim Davidson Arrested By Yewtree Officers
Do you think that Jim Davidson has a point:
"Everyone is now an expert. Just pick someone you don’t like and say it’s them. So I’ll be the first one to knock it on the head and belt up. How’s about that then?”
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
triggerhippy
/// They may good reason not to, they were married, ashamed, were not supposed to be at the party or just knew that a lot of people won't believe them. ///
Let's examine these 'Good reasons not to'.
"They were married"
That presumes that they are no longer married in fact they just got 'un-married' in the very recent past.
"Ashamed"
That means they have now after all these years, suddenly become less 'Ashamed'.
"Not supposed to be at the party",
So one couldn't care less who knows now, obviously this couldn't care less attitude has only just surfaced.
"Just knew that a lot of people won't believe them",
What has taken place recently that makes them think anyone will believe them now?
/// They may good reason not to, they were married, ashamed, were not supposed to be at the party or just knew that a lot of people won't believe them. ///
Let's examine these 'Good reasons not to'.
"They were married"
That presumes that they are no longer married in fact they just got 'un-married' in the very recent past.
"Ashamed"
That means they have now after all these years, suddenly become less 'Ashamed'.
"Not supposed to be at the party",
So one couldn't care less who knows now, obviously this couldn't care less attitude has only just surfaced.
"Just knew that a lot of people won't believe them",
What has taken place recently that makes them think anyone will believe them now?
-- answer removed --
there's a comment on it here
http://
He makes the point that hadlines saying "Savile police arrest JD" are correct but misleading, because they suggest child abuse where there is none, and maybe the police should have set up a separate squad to handle such cases.
http://
He makes the point that hadlines saying "Savile police arrest JD" are correct but misleading, because they suggest child abuse where there is none, and maybe the police should have set up a separate squad to handle such cases.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
"Sparkles, can you explain how you know they didn't report it at the time?"
Because had it been reported at the time I strongly suspect the Red Tops would have found out by now and been all over it like a cheap suit.
It wouldn't surprise in the least if these women are in one of the Sunday Red Tops tomorrow - they'll have a nice little earner, and would have rubbished Davidson to boot. Not bad for a bit of bandwagon jumping.
Because had it been reported at the time I strongly suspect the Red Tops would have found out by now and been all over it like a cheap suit.
It wouldn't surprise in the least if these women are in one of the Sunday Red Tops tomorrow - they'll have a nice little earner, and would have rubbished Davidson to boot. Not bad for a bit of bandwagon jumping.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.