Quizzes & Puzzles11 mins ago
John Mccririrck Sues Channel 4 For Ageism
Victimised pensioner or annoying gob on a stick who should have been dumped years ago?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by woofgang. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I don't think he will sue, however aggrieved he feels. Any solicitor will confirm that he has not been sacked, he has not had his contract renewed, which is entirely lawful, and the perogative of his employers, present and future.
I understand he is seriously respected as a racing journalist, and his eccentric performances have made him an amusing addition to televisison but -
All presenters have a shelf-life, his has come to and end, and at his age, he can surely coast into retiremnet on the cruise-ship circuit, or return to his first job as a print journalist.
He has had a good run, and at 73, he should be looking to wind down and take life easy, and relfect on his wonderful career.
I understand he is seriously respected as a racing journalist, and his eccentric performances have made him an amusing addition to televisison but -
All presenters have a shelf-life, his has come to and end, and at his age, he can surely coast into retiremnet on the cruise-ship circuit, or return to his first job as a print journalist.
He has had a good run, and at 73, he should be looking to wind down and take life easy, and relfect on his wonderful career.
-- answer removed --
Wharton - however it may appear to the viewer, whipping is not as cruel as it appears. For a start, a whip on the haunches of an animal of that size is only going to sting, and in most cases, the jockey is actually moving the whip into the horse's eyeline to encourage it to speed up, rather than physically hitting the horse with it.
Whipping is closely monitored by stewards, and jockeys are routinely punished for exessive use.
Whipping is closely monitored by stewards, and jockeys are routinely punished for exessive use.
I agree that use of the whip does cause some pain, but in proportion, a strike from a jockey whip on an animal the size and strength of a racehorse is unlikely to cause any serious discomfort - otherwise racehorses would simply refuse to run, whipped or not.
There is no benefit to having horses beaten, either in terms of their present and future performance, their health and wellbeing, and their overall responses to being ridden. Therefore use of the ship is tightly controlled by race stewards as I advised.
Personally I do not agree with whipping, but it should not be seen in terms of thoughtless cruelty.
There is no benefit to having horses beaten, either in terms of their present and future performance, their health and wellbeing, and their overall responses to being ridden. Therefore use of the ship is tightly controlled by race stewards as I advised.
Personally I do not agree with whipping, but it should not be seen in terms of thoughtless cruelty.
I don't think training a racehorse with a whip is necessarily as cruel as it appears.
Any animal has to be trained with discipline, and a horse is unlikely to respond to a shouting or a smack on the bottom.
I am sure a whip may sting, but that does not equate to beating.
I don't imagine any horse is going to tolerate being beaten by a rider without attempts to throw him or her - or to immediately play up when a jockey mounts.
Race horses don;t do this, and the idea that they are whipped into racing is a proven fallacy by the simple fact that riderless horses often continue to the end of the race - which they are in no way compelled to do if they choose to stop.
Any animal has to be trained with discipline, and a horse is unlikely to respond to a shouting or a smack on the bottom.
I am sure a whip may sting, but that does not equate to beating.
I don't imagine any horse is going to tolerate being beaten by a rider without attempts to throw him or her - or to immediately play up when a jockey mounts.
Race horses don;t do this, and the idea that they are whipped into racing is a proven fallacy by the simple fact that riderless horses often continue to the end of the race - which they are in no way compelled to do if they choose to stop.
The inspiration for George Orwell to write Animal Farm.
I saw a little boy, perhaps ten years old, driving a huge carthorse along a narrow path, whipping it whenever it tried to turn. It struck me that if only such animals became aware of their strength we should have no power over them and that men exploit animals in much the same way as the rich exploit the proletariat.
I saw a little boy, perhaps ten years old, driving a huge carthorse along a narrow path, whipping it whenever it tried to turn. It struck me that if only such animals became aware of their strength we should have no power over them and that men exploit animals in much the same way as the rich exploit the proletariat.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.