Regrettably, people's names do seem to affect their chances of progressing in life. I used to teach an extremely able student called Fraz Taj, who was unable to find a university place as he was repeatedly rejected. He changed his name by deed poll to David Christopher Parkinson and was immediately snapped up by Oxford University (who had previously rejected his application under his old name).
I holiday every year in Turkey and several Turks that I know have 'Anglised' their names. They take their real name and adopt it to a similar sounding English name. They do that to improve their businesses and ££££. If they have a name the English can remember, then they will get returning patronage to their bars and restaurants.
I suspect Virgin are guilty of something similar in reverse. They are reluctant to employ someone whose name their potential customers cannot remember, spell or pronounce.
From the story it is not known if the failed candidate speaks with a 'foreign' accent (which may be difficult to understand) which may account for his rejection.
Or Virgin has a no blacks policy. Except for Mr Bolt.
Yes, of course they should all lie on their application forms. And why then should a potential employer believe anything else that they offer later in the process?
In the story I don't think the candidate actually got to have his accent judged. His CV was rejected before he could take part in a telephone interview.
I don't know how to put this, but here goes...I accidentally marked your answer as best. Please ignore.
I was trying to cut 'n' paste your answer using an iPad and my finger slipped.
Anyway, regarding your post about the names that were accepted for interview - it would be interesting to compare that to all the rejected names and furthermore to check which candidates had better/worse CV than Mr Kpakio.
i would like to know what is considered a British name now, seeing as how Mohammed is one of the most popular names here, and besides how many John Smiths do you know, apart from the beer.
It's not good that we have immigrants on benefits, but if all the vacancies are being filled by people with British names, maybe we don't need the immigrants?
It is a load of rot and we dont have the full facts here. For instance was it the same person judging the cv? People look for different things for instance a mate of mine is very particular about grammar, I am not.
I'm pretty sure as suggested above this is a money grabbing exercise and actually harms race relations rather than helps it.
And just out of interest how to 'British sounding named people ' judge whether or not htey have been turned down because an 'African sounding named person' is looking at the cv's?
Or are you suggesting racism only exists amongst the British sounding names?
wonder if John Smith would get a job cooking in a Indian restaurant, or Chinese place for that matter. You get all manner of discrimination, i have been discriminated against because of my gender, age, and quite honestly i just accepted that i had to prove i was better than the male candidates. It shouldn't have to be that way of course, but to some extent it still is.
Not unusual in the past. Many a Cohen has become Quinn or Coren or taken some name farther away from a Jewish one.Why would that be?
Occasionally it worked the other way. Max Miller became Max Miller because his wife decided that it was a good name that sounded rather Jewish. At the time Jews were very powerful in entertainment.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.