ChatterBank11 mins ago
Chevez Killed By Venezuela's Historical Ememies.
20 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-22 88731/C havez-k illed-h istoric al-enem ies-hom eland-E xtraord inary-c laim-Ve nezuela s-vice- preside nt-kick s-U-S-d iplomat s.html
The US and it's allies are often accused of various miss-deeds, but this is absolutely ridiculous, don't you think?
The US and it's allies are often accused of various miss-deeds, but this is absolutely ridiculous, don't you think?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.this the US that tried to kill Castro with an exploding cigar?
http:// en.wiki pedia.o rg/wiki /Explod ing_cig ar#CIA_ plot_to _assass inate_C astro
I'm sure they would have done this if they could; and who's to say they couldn't?
http://
I'm sure they would have done this if they could; and who's to say they couldn't?
An exploding cigar would have been a rather ridiculous method of assassination and is surely one of the great myths. Although it may have foundation in a reality of sorts. The US certainly wanted rid of him.
The current allegation from Venezuela's vice president is beneath contempt. I used to think Chavez was a ray of hope for his country, but he turned out to be your typical corrupt, tinpot dictator, conveniently making political capital out of slagging off the US when it suited him but (to his credit actually) not refusing the US dollars which came his way to prop up his country.
The current allegation from Venezuela's vice president is beneath contempt. I used to think Chavez was a ray of hope for his country, but he turned out to be your typical corrupt, tinpot dictator, conveniently making political capital out of slagging off the US when it suited him but (to his credit actually) not refusing the US dollars which came his way to prop up his country.
I don't think ridiculosity is necessarily a deterrent, ichkeria; the only criterion is whether it works. Had it done so, it would have succeeded in making the victim look ridiculous, which would have been a bonus.
As to whether it's true - no idea. But it was widely reported as fact a decade or two ago, as other plans have been
http:// www.gua rdian.c o.uk/wo rld/200 6/aug/0 3/cuba. duncanc ampbell 2
As to whether it's true - no idea. But it was widely reported as fact a decade or two ago, as other plans have been
http://
There's been speculation that Yasser Arafat was killed by the Israelis. An opponent of the Bulgarian communist government was assassinated with a poisoned umbrella in London. More recently, a critic of the current regime in Russia was killed with a poisoned cup of tea, again in London.
Maybe Chevez was killed by the enemies of his country.
Maybe Chevez was killed by the enemies of his country.
Killing someone with a poisoned umbrella (quick, effective and hopefully discreet although not as it turned out, and a murder known to have been committed) is one thing. Giving them cancer, quite apart from anything else, seems a bizarre method of killing someone. Then there's the question: "why would they do that? Hugo Chavez might have irritated the US, but well, need I go on? It's just another idle but predictable conspiracy theory with not a shred of evidence to back it up.
The Castro cigar thing: would Castro have seemed ridiculous if his cigar had exploded? I don't think so: we're not talking Red Nose day pranks here, we talking about trying to eliminate someone effectively and discreetly (see above)
It would be hard to think of a more high-profile and obviously incriminating way to do it. I can imagine it being suggested, and I have no doubt the CIA could have done it, but .. it never happened apart from anything else...
The Castro cigar thing: would Castro have seemed ridiculous if his cigar had exploded? I don't think so: we're not talking Red Nose day pranks here, we talking about trying to eliminate someone effectively and discreetly (see above)
It would be hard to think of a more high-profile and obviously incriminating way to do it. I can imagine it being suggested, and I have no doubt the CIA could have done it, but .. it never happened apart from anything else...
/I don't think that if scientists had a monkey in a Lab. for a number of months they would be able to make it contact cancer, do you? /
Yes we do actually aog
There are a quite a number of cancer inducing chemicals used in lab research
They are called CARCINOGENS
One example is
/Dimethylbenzanthracene; The oxidation of DMBA by P450 enzymes produces metabolites that form covalent adducts with DNA and the formation within DNA of depurinated abasic sites. It is most commonly used to induce skin or mammary tumors in animals, though it also can induce leukemias and tumors at other sites./
http:// www.sig maaldri ch.com/ life-sc ience/c ell-bio logy/ca ncer-re search/ cancer- researc h-produ cts.htm l?Table Page=14 938488
Yes we do actually aog
There are a quite a number of cancer inducing chemicals used in lab research
They are called CARCINOGENS
One example is
/Dimethylbenzanthracene; The oxidation of DMBA by P450 enzymes produces metabolites that form covalent adducts with DNA and the formation within DNA of depurinated abasic sites. It is most commonly used to induce skin or mammary tumors in animals, though it also can induce leukemias and tumors at other sites./
http://
I'd just repeat:
Why would the CIA murder Chavez? Hugo Chavez was not the worst person in the world. At the start he did a lot of good things for his people but he did make political capital out of demonising the US: it was almost you might say a sort of game: it helped his standing at home, he still got large cash subsidies from them and was largely harmless (the Cold War days of Allende and Castro are over).
But the reverse position doesn't apply: he may have irritated the USA, but he wasn't dangerous to them. Why go to the bother of killing him - especially like that, when I am sure they could have arranged an "accident" for him had they really wanted.
Why would the CIA murder Chavez? Hugo Chavez was not the worst person in the world. At the start he did a lot of good things for his people but he did make political capital out of demonising the US: it was almost you might say a sort of game: it helped his standing at home, he still got large cash subsidies from them and was largely harmless (the Cold War days of Allende and Castro are over).
But the reverse position doesn't apply: he may have irritated the USA, but he wasn't dangerous to them. Why go to the bother of killing him - especially like that, when I am sure they could have arranged an "accident" for him had they really wanted.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.