News1 min ago
Sounds Like Good Advice, Agree Or Not?
45 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.jake-the-peg
/// The problem naomi is the tone ///
Read the leaflet, there is no tone to be heard.
http:// i.daily mail.co .uk/i/p ix/2013 /03/19/ article -229571 2-18C66 76F0000 05DC-46 9_634x2 86.jpg
/// The problem naomi is the tone ///
Read the leaflet, there is no tone to be heard.
http://
Well I have
I was made renundant about 20 years ago, fortunately at the time the economy was good but it still took me 5 months to get back in suitable work.
Of course if some of you Tories had had your way you'd have forced me into stacking shelves at Tesco from which I'd have found it very difficult to get back into the IT sector.
Yes - Tone -it's insulting
I can only imagine that if the same sort of tone were used towards ex-servicemen you'd be all spluttering with indignation and saying things like 'Is that any way to treat those who've served their country'
You come over as somewhat superior - viewing the unemployed as all a bunch of workshy layabouts who are achitects of their own demise.
It's not an attractive look
I was made renundant about 20 years ago, fortunately at the time the economy was good but it still took me 5 months to get back in suitable work.
Of course if some of you Tories had had your way you'd have forced me into stacking shelves at Tesco from which I'd have found it very difficult to get back into the IT sector.
Yes - Tone -it's insulting
I can only imagine that if the same sort of tone were used towards ex-servicemen you'd be all spluttering with indignation and saying things like 'Is that any way to treat those who've served their country'
You come over as somewhat superior - viewing the unemployed as all a bunch of workshy layabouts who are achitects of their own demise.
It's not an attractive look
I entirely agree with jake's point - the tone of the message was pompous and high-handed.
The attitude displayed simply underlines the perception of unemployed people - that they are lazy and uncaring and sponge off the state.
That is true in some cases, but so is the perception that employed people with access to computerrs and websites are pompus insensitive uncaring slefish buffoons.
Not all are of course - but who wants to be on the end of such an implication by virtue of social circumsatnces?
The attitude displayed simply underlines the perception of unemployed people - that they are lazy and uncaring and sponge off the state.
That is true in some cases, but so is the perception that employed people with access to computerrs and websites are pompus insensitive uncaring slefish buffoons.
Not all are of course - but who wants to be on the end of such an implication by virtue of social circumsatnces?
well i have been a jill of all trades, but later illness persuaded me to a different life, now i may well be one of these social housing bedroom tax losers, and i have nothing to cut down, i am frugal, and count the pennies, if i had read that leaflet, i would have considered it horribly patronising, as i am sure many have
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.