ChatterBank2 mins ago
Ids Petition Nears A Quarter Of A Million Signatures
IDS has dismissed it as 'a complete stunt'. But 250,000 have signed it in 48 hours.
He has rather shot himself in the foot with the comment he could live on £53 a week.
Do you think he will take up the challenge? Maybe not for a year but maybe a fortnight/month. It will be embarrassing and damaging if he shirks out of it.
He has rather shot himself in the foot with the comment he could live on £53 a week.
Do you think he will take up the challenge? Maybe not for a year but maybe a fortnight/month. It will be embarrassing and damaging if he shirks out of it.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ."If i had too"
Seems reasonable to me.
I cannot equate momentary values of the 50's with today, but i lived (mainly) for 4 years on Corn flakes for breakfast, piece of bread and cheese ( or plate of Spaghetti)for lunch and then beans on toast for dinner. OK not everyday and it wasn't by choice but it can be done.
Seems reasonable to me.
I cannot equate momentary values of the 50's with today, but i lived (mainly) for 4 years on Corn flakes for breakfast, piece of bread and cheese ( or plate of Spaghetti)for lunch and then beans on toast for dinner. OK not everyday and it wasn't by choice but it can be done.
It annoys me that we have so much publicity about benefit cuts, but nobody ever seems to mention the people being made redundant, or who have had their pay cut, or a doing less overtime so less wages, or are struggling on their wages when they have to pay lots of tax (to pay for other people's benefits).
We have known for decades that many people getting benefits should not be getting them:- the shirkers, those pretending they are ill, those fiddling the system, those "playing" the system to maximize their benefits.
At last we have a party trying to do something about it, and all we hear is bleating from the church or the Labour party.
Trouble is if Labour get back in they will start giving away money to anyone and everyone, no questions asked (as they always do), and our debt problems will never go away.
Lets hear it for the WORKERS not the SHIRKERS.
We have known for decades that many people getting benefits should not be getting them:- the shirkers, those pretending they are ill, those fiddling the system, those "playing" the system to maximize their benefits.
At last we have a party trying to do something about it, and all we hear is bleating from the church or the Labour party.
Trouble is if Labour get back in they will start giving away money to anyone and everyone, no questions asked (as they always do), and our debt problems will never go away.
Lets hear it for the WORKERS not the SHIRKERS.
One young man I know works full time and after paying utility bills and £100 a week on petrol to get to another City to do his poor paid job, he has £40 left over.
I know another young man who sits home all day living off the tax payer and after bills he has £37 left over.
The only problem I have is with those fit healthy people who decide they will never work, I have one in my street.
I know another young man who sits home all day living off the tax payer and after bills he has £37 left over.
The only problem I have is with those fit healthy people who decide they will never work, I have one in my street.
http:// www.gua rdian-s eries.c o.uk/ne ws/1032 7664.ID S__Peti tion_is _nothin g_more_ than_a_ stunt_/ ?ref=mr
he has now said that he won't be doing it
"I have been unemployed twice in my life so I have already done this. I know what it is like to live on the breadline."
and the local paper felt it necessary to add [i](lived on the equivalent of £53 a week)[i] even though he didn't say that
he has now said that he won't be doing it
"I have been unemployed twice in my life so I have already done this. I know what it is like to live on the breadline."
and the local paper felt it necessary to add [i](lived on the equivalent of £53 a week)[i] even though he didn't say that
It's always unwise to make these sorts of statements even if you believe they are true.
If he did do it for two weeks, it would be artificial anyway. There have been TV programmes where presenters have done it. Doing it for two weeks is easy when you know that in two weeks' time things will be back to normal.
If he did do it for two weeks, it would be artificial anyway. There have been TV programmes where presenters have done it. Doing it for two weeks is easy when you know that in two weeks' time things will be back to normal.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.