Quizzes & Puzzles22 mins ago
Are The Taliban Running Out Of Male Suicide Bombers?
23 Answers
They are now using animals, females and children to carry out their cowardly suicide bomb attacks, how much lower can they sink?
/// Female suicide bombers are regularly used by the Taliban, with children even reportedly being trained to carry out attacks. ///
/// Female suicide bombers are regularly used by the Taliban, with children even reportedly being trained to carry out attacks. ///
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
AOG
How much lower can they sink?
You're taking about the Taliban, right?
They're a terrorist organisation - is that correct?
Surely being a terrorist means that you've started out pretty low anyway?
Perhaps if they used blind puppies as suicide bombers...but that would cause all sorts of problems...
How much lower can they sink?
You're taking about the Taliban, right?
They're a terrorist organisation - is that correct?
Surely being a terrorist means that you've started out pretty low anyway?
Perhaps if they used blind puppies as suicide bombers...but that would cause all sorts of problems...
A little while ago there was a link to an item about the guys who sit at a desk and pilot a drone to attack people thousands of miles away, being awarded medals.
When I suggested that perhaps the medals should have yellow ribbons, there was much vitriol as I'd implied that it was a cowardly thing to do.
Can anyone explain to me why strapping a bomb to yourself a blowing your self up along with people you class as the enemy is regularly characterized as cowardly, but sitting in a safe office blowing people up by remote control is considered heroic?
When I suggested that perhaps the medals should have yellow ribbons, there was much vitriol as I'd implied that it was a cowardly thing to do.
Can anyone explain to me why strapping a bomb to yourself a blowing your self up along with people you class as the enemy is regularly characterized as cowardly, but sitting in a safe office blowing people up by remote control is considered heroic?
Watch out for the Afghan RSPCA for this one...
http://
http://
rojash
i think it is the commanders who send the Suicide Bombers who are accused of cowardice not the suicide bombers themselves because they are exploiting others
Particularly when the bombers are children or people who may have been forced or intimidated into doing it
However, that does raise the question of how you measure any difference between those commanders and those in a conventional army who are sometimes sending service people on missions or into situations where a safe return is very unlikely
In such cases they may ask for volunteers
But I suspect the Taliban commanders would argue that they do as well
i think it is the commanders who send the Suicide Bombers who are accused of cowardice not the suicide bombers themselves because they are exploiting others
Particularly when the bombers are children or people who may have been forced or intimidated into doing it
However, that does raise the question of how you measure any difference between those commanders and those in a conventional army who are sometimes sending service people on missions or into situations where a safe return is very unlikely
In such cases they may ask for volunteers
But I suspect the Taliban commanders would argue that they do as well
As low as all those allied commanders who sent people out on near certain suicide missions eh?
http://
Ah but that's different because a foreign force had invaded another country
Oh - yes right
http://
Ah but that's different because a foreign force had invaded another country
Oh - yes right
-- answer removed --
It is also interesting to note that no comments have been made about the use of women and children in their suicide attacks. /
Yes it was
at 15.38
regarding the donkeys; you may find that the debate took a more generic view of the problem, possibly because you failed to provide a link to the News item you had in mind
Yes it was
at 15.38
regarding the donkeys; you may find that the debate took a more generic view of the problem, possibly because you failed to provide a link to the News item you had in mind
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.