News0 min ago
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
/i was stating a fact /
Really baz?
/Hes a grade A1 rsole always has been always will be./
Looks like a subjective opinion to me
Perhaps you need to brush up your English Comprehension and engage a few more brain cells if you want to rise from 'making a point' to the more 'technical' areas of intelligent debate
Really baz?
/Hes a grade A1 rsole always has been always will be./
Looks like a subjective opinion to me
Perhaps you need to brush up your English Comprehension and engage a few more brain cells if you want to rise from 'making a point' to the more 'technical' areas of intelligent debate
/Not at all I was merely pointing out the fact that leaders who share a bond with a loathed dictator is not the preserve of the person currently in the line of fire. /
What does that actually mean?
Pinochet helped the UK forces out, MT owed him a debt of gratitude. Nothing more, nothing less.
Your last line - Are you also trying to degrade the debate to the ongoing spat of baz and zeuhl - which is unnecessary on both parts? I hope not, as I put you above that.
What does that actually mean?
Pinochet helped the UK forces out, MT owed him a debt of gratitude. Nothing more, nothing less.
Your last line - Are you also trying to degrade the debate to the ongoing spat of baz and zeuhl - which is unnecessary on both parts? I hope not, as I put you above that.
OK Zeuhl old boy. Sorry I missed your earlier post I've been otherwise engaged. The funeral for MT has been discussed between the Parties (and obviously with HM the Queen) for quite some time. It was decided that she deserved the recognition of a state funeral, but in her last will MT vetoed the idea 'in these times of economic crisis the money should not be squandered on a state funeral, and ordered that she be cremated'. David Cameron in his wisdom decided that she should be granted a 'ceremonial funeral' which was agreed upon by all concerned. To ask us, the general public I suppose would be like asking us if we were ready for a referendum on the EU. But there are too many dong dingers like George 'pussy' Galloway to confuse and delay the issue so I think he decided 'best not'.
-- answer removed --
have the red wine open here and Uni challenge followed by Korea.
I understand where you are coming from but the difference was one of national debt - not unless you are suggesting that Pinochet is the equivalent of Galloway for helping the other nation - then arrest Gorgeous George and asap, Inspector Knacker....!
Enjoy the pints.
I understand where you are coming from but the difference was one of national debt - not unless you are suggesting that Pinochet is the equivalent of Galloway for helping the other nation - then arrest Gorgeous George and asap, Inspector Knacker....!
Enjoy the pints.
Steve-5 I don't think that cretin Galloway had anything to gain for the UK from his friendship with Saddam Hussein, this was a man with a record of genocide and terrible human rights abuses, worse than Pinochet. Galloway thrives on trying to be controversial and just sucks up to anyone. He ought to be shipped to Iraq and made to stay there. Whereas Pinochet for all his faults was extremely helpful to the UK during the Argentinian spat, MT always remembered her allies in times of need.