ChatterBank10 mins ago
Could Not Send Card Because Her Friend Was Called Dick.
29 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-23 23601/M -S-cens ors-gra nnys-ca rd-frie nd-Dick -Store- admits- banned- tells-f riend-R ichard- instead .html
Seems like another of our once well known words has caught the eye of the 'over sensitive force'.
What other once innocent words, are now a no, no?
Seems like another of our once well known words has caught the eye of the 'over sensitive force'.
What other once innocent words, are now a no, no?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It's a failure of technology rather than anything else. As yet it's not clear how to get round it. "Exclude Dick except when capitalised or followed by a surname" won't work, for example, and can't really be translated efficiently into computer code that I know of.
The M&S suggestion was, just about, the only way round it unfortunately. The problem is that you do want to stop people sending offensive e-cards, and unfortunately in some contexts Dick is offensive. A computer cannot tell the difference, yet. And to have staff moderating such e-cards individually would be expensive.
The M&S suggestion was, just about, the only way round it unfortunately. The problem is that you do want to stop people sending offensive e-cards, and unfortunately in some contexts Dick is offensive. A computer cannot tell the difference, yet. And to have staff moderating such e-cards individually would be expensive.
To illustrate the problem the words "mishit" and "Scunthorpe" are rendered on one US-based forum I used as:
mi*doodoo*
s*eXpletive*horpe
Yes, really!
In its defence, that site has a few children as young as ten visiting regularly, and is meant to be "family-friendly" with some very nice people. Unfortunately, the word censor device is necessary, but a blunt and unsophisticated instrument.
mi*doodoo*
s*eXpletive*horpe
Yes, really!
In its defence, that site has a few children as young as ten visiting regularly, and is meant to be "family-friendly" with some very nice people. Unfortunately, the word censor device is necessary, but a blunt and unsophisticated instrument.
Not really a story is it?
We get this all the time on here
Actually I used to work on a software product that did profanity filterring and in the early days falsing on profane words inside genuine ones was an issue - we called it the 'Scunthorpe problem'
It seems riddiculous to people because we're very good at distinguishing abusive language from innocent terms but computers are very bad.
Remember too that this has to be done in different languages and different cultures - American abusive terminology is quite different to ours.
We had to ask our localisation teams to compile lists of abusive terminology - The Chinese group got quite excited and went to a nightclub with clipboards and compiled a great list.
I suspect an excuse to go to a nightclub on expenses
We get this all the time on here
Actually I used to work on a software product that did profanity filterring and in the early days falsing on profane words inside genuine ones was an issue - we called it the 'Scunthorpe problem'
It seems riddiculous to people because we're very good at distinguishing abusive language from innocent terms but computers are very bad.
Remember too that this has to be done in different languages and different cultures - American abusive terminology is quite different to ours.
We had to ask our localisation teams to compile lists of abusive terminology - The Chinese group got quite excited and went to a nightclub with clipboards and compiled a great list.
I suspect an excuse to go to a nightclub on expenses
We use something called "regular expressions" on our filter to try and avoid that kind of stuff. It can do quite clever things, if you tell it to - but that's the issue, we have to create a large number of exceptions for it to work (and it's never 100% satisfactory).
I'd like to also just point out that, if anyone ever finds something filtered which really ought not to be, then please get in touch and let us know the issue. We're more than happy to take most things out of the filter.
I'd like to also just point out that, if anyone ever finds something filtered which really ought not to be, then please get in touch and let us know the issue. We're more than happy to take most things out of the filter.
Automated profanity checkers programs often ban innocent words. It used to be a problem on AB before they modified their system. It is unlikely in this instance that it was ever seen and censored by a human.
I remember Nightwatchman was also banned on here.
The new filter which replaces naughty words with an innocent one is much more fun.
botox
I remember Nightwatchman was also banned on here.
The new filter which replaces naughty words with an innocent one is much more fun.
botox
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.