Donate SIGN UP

Mugger Beat Ex-Soldier, 79.

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 12:30 Tue 21st May 2013 | News
68 Answers
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2328187/Richard-Christie-beat-ex-soldier-Bill-Hopkins-badly-died-stealing-wallet-containing-just-40-card-wifes-memorial-service.html

Obviously this cretin must have had a police record for them to have his DNA on file, it is through this that the police were able to trace him and bring this piece of pond life to justice.

With this in mind the question that must be asked is "should everyone's DNA be on file"?
Gravatar

Answers

61 to 68 of 68rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
So let me get this straight Judderman, by your reckoning English people are less likely to be violent criminals? You know that's not historically or even contemporarily true right?
No to compulsory mass DNA screening.

It offends the libertarian in me.
and me Lazy Gun :)
thejudderman

The mugger, Richard Christie - are you sure he was an immigrant?

I can't find any reference to him being an immigrant in the report. Did you get that info from another newspaper, or online somewhere?

Not saying you're wrong...it's just that I might have missed it (admittedly, I scanned the report in the link twice, but pretty quickly...).
Question Author
sp1814

/// 2. More importantly, once the information is stored, we would have to be sure that it could not be used against us by any future government or government agency...for the rest of our live. How do we know how that information could be used in the future? How do we know that some 'progressive' government would not licence the information to a third party for a fee - such as health providers, or the insurance industry? ///

Lets put this 'usual excuse' to an end, shall we?

If some 'future Government' did get in power, they could make it compulsory for our DNA to be collected for their records anyway, so they could still use it against us.

As regards the rest well it seems that all records are 'unsafe' so why bother keeping them?
Question Author
triggerhippy

/// I don't understand how people of AOG's age who fought so hard for liberty are happy to just give it away now. ///

This has nothing to do with the loss of liberty, even "when we were fighting hard for liberty" as you put it, we still all had to carry ID.

We still have to be 'registered' at birth.

We still have to have a NI number

Also if one drives a car, wishes to travel to another country, be eligible to vote, we all need to go down on some form of a data base, and then are we not compelled to fill in a census form?
-- answer removed --
AOG

"If some 'future Government' did get in power, they could make it compulsory for our DNA to be collected for their records anyway"

That would be an extremely difficult 'sell'.

61 to 68 of 68rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4

Do you know the answer?

Mugger Beat Ex-Soldier, 79.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.