Road rules4 mins ago
The Prime Minister Has Spoken.
37 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-23 29192/W oolwich -attack -Terror -attack -divide -makes- stronge r-Camer on-urge s-Brita in-cont inue-no rmal-li fe.html
Well our PM has spoken and told us all to "KEEP CALM AND CARRY ON".
He also said that "the terror attack will not divide us but bring us together and make us stronger",
Do you think this utopian dream of 'togetherness' will really work, because we were not very together before?
/// Mr Cameron revealed that the two suspected killers were known to the security services and promised that the authorities will investigate into whether the attack could have been prevented ///
Bit late in the day to save that poor lad's life I think, perhaps those two savages should have been 'netted' sooner?
Well our PM has spoken and told us all to "KEEP CALM AND CARRY ON".
He also said that "the terror attack will not divide us but bring us together and make us stronger",
Do you think this utopian dream of 'togetherness' will really work, because we were not very together before?
/// Mr Cameron revealed that the two suspected killers were known to the security services and promised that the authorities will investigate into whether the attack could have been prevented ///
Bit late in the day to save that poor lad's life I think, perhaps those two savages should have been 'netted' sooner?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It may never work, because not everyone wants to be together, but we ought to try even so. Division is damaging. Yesterday, it cost someone his life in horrific circumstances. If we react by becoming ever more divisive, that will in the end lead to yet more deaths, yet more violence and misery. The reactions of those who brand a whole community, or a whole society, are different and to be feared because of the actions of a few are understandable but completely the wrong approach. It solves nothing. Just more divisions. Yes, we should try to unite.
So how about we start here, and not argue amongst ourselves?
In answer to the second point. We don't yet know exactly what was known to the Security Services about these people. It may have been very little, in which case there was nothing more that could have been done -- you cannot arrest people and lock them up on essentially no evidence. It may have been a lot, in which case why was nothing more done? Hindsight is a blessing and a curse -- now we know that the two men probably should have been arrested beforehand, but we didn't know that yesterday morning. I just hope that our Security Services didn't miss a genuine chance to do something about it.
So how about we start here, and not argue amongst ourselves?
In answer to the second point. We don't yet know exactly what was known to the Security Services about these people. It may have been very little, in which case there was nothing more that could have been done -- you cannot arrest people and lock them up on essentially no evidence. It may have been a lot, in which case why was nothing more done? Hindsight is a blessing and a curse -- now we know that the two men probably should have been arrested beforehand, but we didn't know that yesterday morning. I just hope that our Security Services didn't miss a genuine chance to do something about it.
//Strange thing, the two murderers were known by MI 5, as were the 2 bombers who killed innocent people at the Boston marathon. Should the security services be allowed to do more than 'observe' potential Terrorists and 'netted' sooner? Or would this just lead to more trouble? //
sebhfhion
What - like i suggested in my post at 16:40 above ?
sebhfhion
What - like i suggested in my post at 16:40 above ?