ChatterBank52 mins ago
Older People Have Never Had It So Good
// Pensioners in their 60s and 70s have seen their incomes rise steadily during the recession years - and now they are less likely to be poor than any other group in society, according to a new report.
A senior Church of England cleric, Bishop of London the Right Reverend Richard Chartres, said the ‘fortunate generation’ in their 60s are soaking up too much taxpayers’ money and that state spending on older people ‘raises questions of intergenerational equity’. //
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-23 41553/O lder-pe ople-go od-New- report- says-60 s-seen- incomes -rise-r ecessio n.html# ixzz2WY p1jtcy
Why are we still paying £billions to them to pay for free travel and winter fuel, which were after all, just Tony Blair's election bribes?
A senior Church of England cleric, Bishop of London the Right Reverend Richard Chartres, said the ‘fortunate generation’ in their 60s are soaking up too much taxpayers’ money and that state spending on older people ‘raises questions of intergenerational equity’. //
http://
Why are we still paying £billions to them to pay for free travel and winter fuel, which were after all, just Tony Blair's election bribes?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
"...not all pensioners get free prescriptions, "
Everybody aged 60 and over gets free prescriptions, em:
http:// www.nhs .uk/NHS England /Health costs/P ages/Pr escript ioncost s.aspx
Everybody aged 60 and over gets free prescriptions, em:
http://
Em10
If you friend get no benefits, it must mean they have savings (I think the threshold is about £20,000). You can argue that that is penalising people who have saved for their old age. But it could also be argued, why should we pay for rents and council tax for someone with lots of money in the bank. When you were paying your contributions £40 years ago, you understood the contract would be you got an old age pension when you retired. You never dreamed that the state would be paying for your travel, and fuel and television licence and in many cases rent and rates.
If you friend get no benefits, it must mean they have savings (I think the threshold is about £20,000). You can argue that that is penalising people who have saved for their old age. But it could also be argued, why should we pay for rents and council tax for someone with lots of money in the bank. When you were paying your contributions £40 years ago, you understood the contract would be you got an old age pension when you retired. You never dreamed that the state would be paying for your travel, and fuel and television licence and in many cases rent and rates.
Razza,
Did you read the Institute of Fiscal Studies report? It is what the Mail story in the OP and my post is about. It is very short. Here is the link again.
http:// www.ifs .org.uk /confer ences/I ncome_l ongrun2 013.pdf
The IFS is rather well respected. Do you not believe it? Are they living in cloud cuckooland?
Did you read the Institute of Fiscal Studies report? It is what the Mail story in the OP and my post is about. It is very short. Here is the link again.
http://
The IFS is rather well respected. Do you not believe it? Are they living in cloud cuckooland?
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --