ChatterBank0 min ago
Stop And Search Arrest Ratios
Just been on the news. Last year there were 1.2 million stop and searches.
This resulted in 109,000 arrests (9%).
In what ways can the police improve this figure? Do these searches need to be 'intelligence-led'? Are they simply stopping too many people, wasting their own time - or does the 109,000 arrests justify the 1.2 million stops?
The only link I have is this, as its only just been on the news:
http://
This resulted in 109,000 arrests (9%).
In what ways can the police improve this figure? Do these searches need to be 'intelligence-led'? Are they simply stopping too many people, wasting their own time - or does the 109,000 arrests justify the 1.2 million stops?
The only link I have is this, as its only just been on the news:
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Approx 10% arrest to search ratio seems balanced bearing in mind most searches are conducted in response to a crime having just been committed and information (descriptions) provided by members of the public. 1.2 million searches are an average of every copper carrying out 10 stop-searches per year each. Stop searches are also a good source of intelligence.
So 109,000 criminals were arrested last year after being stopped and searched? Sounds like a result to me
Why do people who are stopped and searched without being arrested bleat on about it so much? If they've got nothing to hide then what's the problem apart from it being a minor, brief inconvenience?
If it takes criminals off the streets then whatever the percentage of arrests it has to be a good thing
Why do people who are stopped and searched without being arrested bleat on about it so much? If they've got nothing to hide then what's the problem apart from it being a minor, brief inconvenience?
If it takes criminals off the streets then whatever the percentage of arrests it has to be a good thing
It's possible that some of the people stopped and searched were the same person repeatedly, which may improve the figures a bit, but probably not by much. Also perhaps some stops may lead to cautions, etc. -- why is an arrest considered the only positive result?
I think it depends a lot on what motivated the stops in the the first place. If police have reasonable suspicions I'm sure we'd all rather they act on them and be wrong than not act and find that the suspicions were right -- and this could easily lead to a surprisingly low "success" rate. I think it's known that not all stops have much motivation beyond e.g. skin colour, but again if you are looking for a young black man in a hooded top you might find rather a lot more than the guilty person.
In short: I'm not sure we should regard 9% as necessarily being far too low, until we also know why the stops and searched were carried out and whether any also led to cautions.
I think it depends a lot on what motivated the stops in the the first place. If police have reasonable suspicions I'm sure we'd all rather they act on them and be wrong than not act and find that the suspicions were right -- and this could easily lead to a surprisingly low "success" rate. I think it's known that not all stops have much motivation beyond e.g. skin colour, but again if you are looking for a young black man in a hooded top you might find rather a lot more than the guilty person.
In short: I'm not sure we should regard 9% as necessarily being far too low, until we also know why the stops and searched were carried out and whether any also led to cautions.
// In what ways can the police improve this figure? Do these searches need to be 'intelligence-led'? //
Intelligence led searches are know as police investigations, which are different thing entirely. Is what you're actually asking 'should we abolish stop and search?'. At a 9% arrest rate I'd say the answer is no.
Intelligence led searches are know as police investigations, which are different thing entirely. Is what you're actually asking 'should we abolish stop and search?'. At a 9% arrest rate I'd say the answer is no.
If a thousand stop and searches prevented one loss of life then no matter how much it cost it would be worth it.
A black woman phoned a radio station and announced that her 14 year son had been stopped and searched by the police and they found a weapon on him, instead of showing annoyance towards the police, she said that it was a job well done, since it had stopped her son or perhaps some other's life from being ruined.
A black woman phoned a radio station and announced that her 14 year son had been stopped and searched by the police and they found a weapon on him, instead of showing annoyance towards the police, she said that it was a job well done, since it had stopped her son or perhaps some other's life from being ruined.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.