Travel0 min ago
Can't Be Bad, Can It?
14 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-23 54396/B enefits -mother -11-Hea ther-Fr ost-wee ks-away -500k-l uxury-e co-home -paid-t axpayer .html
Well after announcing in the past that she did not know if she would accept this luxury house, it now looks as if she is all set to move in.
Well after announcing in the past that she did not know if she would accept this luxury house, it now looks as if she is all set to move in.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It's not a luxury house, it's not her house.
It has been built in a way that it can be divided in to two separate houses when she no longer rents it.
What should the council do with her? Put all the children in to care? Have her and the kids live in a squat?
That house is nothing compared to some of those in London that are used as council housing, some worth more than two million pounds.
It has been built in a way that it can be divided in to two separate houses when she no longer rents it.
What should the council do with her? Put all the children in to care? Have her and the kids live in a squat?
That house is nothing compared to some of those in London that are used as council housing, some worth more than two million pounds.
Not any more, hc. There was such a fuss about £2 million houses being used by those on benefits that the government stepped in, didn't they? The rule had been daft. It provided that anyone who turned up as a resident of a borough had to be suitably house within the borough. If the borough only had large houses that were worth millions, those houses had to be rented. The fact that some other borough had plenty of much cheaper houses didn't matter and the claimant couldn't be transferred to one.
She's changed her mind - not moving in
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-glouc estersh ire-231 78795
http://