ChatterBank1 min ago
Jim Davidson Bailed Again
I don't want to interfere with due legal process but these investigations seem to be taking an awful lot of time :::::
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -232544 97
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Henri Brandman defending , eh? That's showbiz! He is a showbiz solicitor and his career is mostly arguing about contracts, but his crime practice started with page 3 girls and progressed from there. His advantage is that knows every editor and all the paparazzi, and can prevent their wilder moments. He won't be cheap. Not to be taken as proof of guilt that you hire him though, at great cost.
As to the case, Henri Brandman is happy with it, so that's good enough. Don't expect any salacious gossip in the tabloids about Mr Davidson; he'll stop that. I think it is a bit ridiculous to round up suspects , not have the evidence to charge them, and then bail them for weeks and weeks while you try to find it. Either you've got witness statement/s to charge or you haven't. But if no charge ensues , expect stories of my life of living hell when I was innocent, says Jim, to appear immediately (see H Brandman , above!)
As to the case, Henri Brandman is happy with it, so that's good enough. Don't expect any salacious gossip in the tabloids about Mr Davidson; he'll stop that. I think it is a bit ridiculous to round up suspects , not have the evidence to charge them, and then bail them for weeks and weeks while you try to find it. Either you've got witness statement/s to charge or you haven't. But if no charge ensues , expect stories of my life of living hell when I was innocent, says Jim, to appear immediately (see H Brandman , above!)
I was pretty shocked that all this hinges on accusation and confession (two parties needed) and not much else.
how ever that has been the case for sexual offences for close on twenty years - otherwise no one gets convicted because well you know - you usually do it in private.
St Fred can usefully intervene here
I worry because depressed old men confess to things they didnt do
[and I may be one, one day !]
but that is modern day Justice for you !
how ever that has been the case for sexual offences for close on twenty years - otherwise no one gets convicted because well you know - you usually do it in private.
St Fred can usefully intervene here
I worry because depressed old men confess to things they didnt do
[and I may be one, one day !]
but that is modern day Justice for you !
PP, the law demanded corroboration both of the evidence of children and of complainants in sexual cases. Corroboration had to be independent evidence of the crime. The jury had to be warned of the danger of convicting without it and judges would often stop cases when there was no corroboration and direct an acquittal. The result was offenders of the kind that these celebrities are alleged to be, were never arrested or charged and they could continue their activities without hindrance.
The rule for corroboration of children was abolished in 1988 and that for sexual offences in 1994.
The rule for corroboration of children was abolished in 1988 and that for sexual offences in 1994.
Not that criminal, Sandy. He resisted the temptation to mention potting a black or kissing the brown. But he had his doubts. I met him in a clinic for alcoholics once , when he was still on TV, and he introduced himself by saying " I am Jim Davidson.....I am a comic" See? Even he thought I wouldn't know what he was supposed to be :)
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.