Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
More Savagery On The Streets Of Our Capital.
70 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-23 80709/N aomi-On i-acid- attacke rs-pour ed-acid -mother -walked -year-o ld-twin s-home- school. html
One reader put, "These are not humans but aliens from another planet".
But did this person get it wrong?
Surely they are "aliens from another country" and as such, we don't want the likes of them in Britain.
One reader put, "These are not humans but aliens from another planet".
But did this person get it wrong?
Surely they are "aliens from another country" and as such, we don't want the likes of them in Britain.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.try here aog
Post removed on first page
"comment" from the ED on second page
http://
Much as find the whole incident vile and deplorable, I can't see any evidence in that article for AOG's description of "aliens from another country" - it doesn't say anything to indicate that the perpetrators, although black, are not born and bred in this county, and British citizens? Am I missing something?
andy-hughes
/// AOG - I am unable to recall the thread on which your personal attack was made - it did make reference to my grandparents being unmarried, and was removed - sorry if you forget so quickly. ///
You were that upset regarding the personal attack i made against you that you forgot about it, and yet you expect me to remember it?????????
But yes now you mention your grandparents I do now remember. You made reference to members of our armed forces as being 'paid killers' to which I took offence.
I think you went on to say something about not being married to such persons, (paid killers) to which I replied that if persons had that feeling in 1939-1945 what a sorry state we would be in now, and the fact that you would not have been around now if your grandparent had been a serving soldier/sailor/or airman.
And that was the point where you took offence, led on by a fellow ABer who put the words that I was calling you a Bast**d simply because I said “that was of course if your grandparents had married”, which was only my way of taking in all eventualities, in case someone popped up and said "ah, but Andy's grandparents might not have married, what then"?
It was all as simple as that, nothing more nothing less.
/// And the thread on which you were censured was the one when you linked to an atrocious pro-Nazi site and were censured by the Ed directly. ///
And this was another case where I innocently conducted a Google search to come up with some information regarding the Far-Left, the side of politics that gets very little criticism compared to the Far-Right, so as to balance things up a little.
And I came up with a passage on the site in question which provided me with exactly the right sort of thing I was looking for, so I copied and pasted that section, noting that there wasn't anything offensive or against the rules of the site, I also posted the link from which I gained that particular passage from, completely unaware that it was a dodgy site.
It was only then that the usual suspects went up in arms, and accused me of posting neo-nazi propaganda material, what amazed me however was the fact that if those persons knew that the link was to such publication, they could have chose not to open it up. You then went on almost demanding that I apologised, to the rest of the sensitive shrinking violets that took offence, this in turn caused the AB-Ed to get involved and openly chastised me in front of my accusers, which he failed to do to another ABer a while back, when that person posted on AB a pornographic illustration of a new stamp, which was not removed until I complained, it would seem that some are treated more leniently than others, but then they do not have a pack of baying hounds forever on their heels, waiting to pounce on every occasion.
/// AOG - I am unable to recall the thread on which your personal attack was made - it did make reference to my grandparents being unmarried, and was removed - sorry if you forget so quickly. ///
You were that upset regarding the personal attack i made against you that you forgot about it, and yet you expect me to remember it?????????
But yes now you mention your grandparents I do now remember. You made reference to members of our armed forces as being 'paid killers' to which I took offence.
I think you went on to say something about not being married to such persons, (paid killers) to which I replied that if persons had that feeling in 1939-1945 what a sorry state we would be in now, and the fact that you would not have been around now if your grandparent had been a serving soldier/sailor/or airman.
And that was the point where you took offence, led on by a fellow ABer who put the words that I was calling you a Bast**d simply because I said “that was of course if your grandparents had married”, which was only my way of taking in all eventualities, in case someone popped up and said "ah, but Andy's grandparents might not have married, what then"?
It was all as simple as that, nothing more nothing less.
/// And the thread on which you were censured was the one when you linked to an atrocious pro-Nazi site and were censured by the Ed directly. ///
And this was another case where I innocently conducted a Google search to come up with some information regarding the Far-Left, the side of politics that gets very little criticism compared to the Far-Right, so as to balance things up a little.
And I came up with a passage on the site in question which provided me with exactly the right sort of thing I was looking for, so I copied and pasted that section, noting that there wasn't anything offensive or against the rules of the site, I also posted the link from which I gained that particular passage from, completely unaware that it was a dodgy site.
It was only then that the usual suspects went up in arms, and accused me of posting neo-nazi propaganda material, what amazed me however was the fact that if those persons knew that the link was to such publication, they could have chose not to open it up. You then went on almost demanding that I apologised, to the rest of the sensitive shrinking violets that took offence, this in turn caused the AB-Ed to get involved and openly chastised me in front of my accusers, which he failed to do to another ABer a while back, when that person posted on AB a pornographic illustration of a new stamp, which was not removed until I complained, it would seem that some are treated more leniently than others, but then they do not have a pack of baying hounds forever on their heels, waiting to pounce on every occasion.
AOG, are you minded to be pleased that so many people who are foreign or of foreign ancestry, work in the NHS as doctors, porters, nurses etc, or in the CPS as prosecutors, or in corner shops, or in the fields, or in a multitude of other necessary jobs?
Are you prepared to refuse them because some of that origin commit crimes? Do you accept that there are violent and other criminal elements in all races and ancestry?
Are you prepared to refuse them because some of that origin commit crimes? Do you accept that there are violent and other criminal elements in all races and ancestry?
AOG - "You then went on almost demanding that I apologised, to the rest of the sensitive shrinking violets that took offence, this in turn caused the AB-Ed to get involved and openly chastised me in front of my accusers, which he failed to do to another ABer a while back, when that person posted on AB a pornographic illustration of a new stamp, which was not removed until I complained, it would seem that some are treated more leniently than others, but then they do not have a pack of baying hounds forever on their heels, waiting to pounce on every occasion."
You were rude to me, and posted offensive material.
I took you up on both.
You requested proof.
It has been provided.
You accuse me of 'virtually demanding' an apology when you know i did no such thing - I specifically said that I was not in the business of 'demanding' anything.
And STILL you see this 'conspiracy' against you by some imagined left-wing cabal on this site.
In closure AOG - I think you should have apologised for your 'Nazi' post, albeit done without malice, if offence is caused, an apology is a polite response.
You have chosen not to do so, your choice, but it is noted by those who disagree with you, and they respond accordingly, not because they jump on any bandwaggons, or because they are perceived 'lefties' or any of the other terms you trot out when you are one of your 'poor me' jags like this one.
I am stepping off this merry-go-round with you - thanks again to Baldric for support - not requested or expected in case you think we are in league.
You cannot be bumptious and rude one day, and shoulder-shrugging and wonder why 'everyone is out to get you' the next.
You called me childish, among your other insults - it does take one to know one.
Now let's move on.
You were rude to me, and posted offensive material.
I took you up on both.
You requested proof.
It has been provided.
You accuse me of 'virtually demanding' an apology when you know i did no such thing - I specifically said that I was not in the business of 'demanding' anything.
And STILL you see this 'conspiracy' against you by some imagined left-wing cabal on this site.
In closure AOG - I think you should have apologised for your 'Nazi' post, albeit done without malice, if offence is caused, an apology is a polite response.
You have chosen not to do so, your choice, but it is noted by those who disagree with you, and they respond accordingly, not because they jump on any bandwaggons, or because they are perceived 'lefties' or any of the other terms you trot out when you are one of your 'poor me' jags like this one.
I am stepping off this merry-go-round with you - thanks again to Baldric for support - not requested or expected in case you think we are in league.
You cannot be bumptious and rude one day, and shoulder-shrugging and wonder why 'everyone is out to get you' the next.
You called me childish, among your other insults - it does take one to know one.
Now let's move on.
douglas, my reference to Glaswegians was a dig at AOG, who, it seems to me, has what we might politely call "a distrust of foreigners". It is true that I have defended many a Glaswegian, but it is also true that I have defended and prosecuted many another Briton. That answer would not have served my purpose in pointing up stereotyping on a grand scale
Interesting to note that if one dares to condemn savagery committed by a non white one can expect to be more criticised than the perpetrators of such vile acts.
Here is the type of thing one can expect, no first let me correct that not all persons only myself and anyone else who dares to criticise non-whites, and readers of the Daily Mail web-site.
/// What a surprise AOG ! that ::
A :::: this comes from the Daily Mail.
B :::: it concerns foreigners !
Would you have posted this if the perpetrators of this horrid attack had been white British and their victim were black ? ///
/// Only you could put a racial spin on such a dreadful story AOG. ///
/// Was going to post the obvious examples of white British people throwing acid But I simply just can't be bothered it's such a stupid mindless post ///
/// AOG, are you suggesting that random attacks which disfigure the victims for life are exclusively the province of "foreigners" ? ///
/// Why are the majority of your posts about non white people? ///
/// I don't often respond to your threads AOG but I find you racist, intolerant and petulant. ///
/// I did once see AOG, described by a Moderator, as AB's most successful troll ///
All that for daring to post on a savage attack of a poor defenceless woman, perhaps those whose posts I have highlighted should consider the victims of these savages, instead of protecting them from condemnation.
Here is the type of thing one can expect, no first let me correct that not all persons only myself and anyone else who dares to criticise non-whites, and readers of the Daily Mail web-site.
/// What a surprise AOG ! that ::
A :::: this comes from the Daily Mail.
B :::: it concerns foreigners !
Would you have posted this if the perpetrators of this horrid attack had been white British and their victim were black ? ///
/// Only you could put a racial spin on such a dreadful story AOG. ///
/// Was going to post the obvious examples of white British people throwing acid But I simply just can't be bothered it's such a stupid mindless post ///
/// AOG, are you suggesting that random attacks which disfigure the victims for life are exclusively the province of "foreigners" ? ///
/// Why are the majority of your posts about non white people? ///
/// I don't often respond to your threads AOG but I find you racist, intolerant and petulant. ///
/// I did once see AOG, described by a Moderator, as AB's most successful troll ///
All that for daring to post on a savage attack of a poor defenceless woman, perhaps those whose posts I have highlighted should consider the victims of these savages, instead of protecting them from condemnation.
AOG - "All that for daring to post on a savage attack of a poor defenceless woman, perhaps those whose posts I have highlighted should consider the victims of these savages, instead of protecting them from condemnation."
Once again you take a selective view of your posts, and others.
Speaking personally, I have not for one moment defended the actions of these dreadful individuals - nor to my knowledge has anyone else, but they can post for themselves.
If you are trying to set yourself up as some knight in shining armour, defender of the weak, then your OP has a strange way of going about it - focusing on the ehtnic origins of the perpatrators, and their fitness to live here, rather than the crime they have committed.
Once again you take a selective view of your posts, and others.
Speaking personally, I have not for one moment defended the actions of these dreadful individuals - nor to my knowledge has anyone else, but they can post for themselves.
If you are trying to set yourself up as some knight in shining armour, defender of the weak, then your OP has a strange way of going about it - focusing on the ehtnic origins of the perpatrators, and their fitness to live here, rather than the crime they have committed.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.