How can it be (quote) "shockingly complacent and arrogant", Jake, to state the plain truth or can you actually offer evidence of any conflict where behaviour such as I mentioned did not occur?
In the past day or two, the families of British Military Policemen killed in Iraq have been given leave to 'sue' the MoD on the basis that the men were inadequately provided-for by superiors. What civilians never seem to grasp is that any examination of military activity should always carry the qualifying words, "as things turned out". As it "turned out", they clearly didn't have enough ammunition, for instance, but how were their superiors to know they would be trapped, surrounded by a baying mob of armed civilians and, consequently, how much ammunition WOULD have been enough?
Yes, these men were not slaughtered by soldiers but by a crowd of enraged civilians which is clear evidence of what I said; namely, that it is not just the military who are guilty of atrocities, as you appear to believe.
I'm not suggesting that gunning people down from a helicopter is any better than killing trapped soldiers, but I am saying that it is certainly no worse.
As I said, things such as both these incidents - military and civilian - HAPPEN in wars...end of.
(Since you appear to have got on your patronisingly high horse with me personally once again, I'll leave it at that.)