Question Author
FredPuli43
/// AOG it is evident from his wife's summing up that his being called Frank is an incidental detail. But the Daily Mail want to have it as the essence of the case. Well, that's predictable, just as it's predictable for you to seize on it. It's one of the Daily Mail's journalistic ways, and not a particularly good one, but it obviously works ///
Didn't the Daily Mail also use in their headline:
*** and passed over for promotion for seven years ***
Was this also an incidental detail, or do you think the Daily Mail should have put all the points of his case in a single headline?
*** Mrs Simpson added: 'In conclusion, it is submitted that Mr Simpson has experienced racial discrimination, victimisation and harassment in the form of a constant shifting of the goalposts by the respondents. ***
*** 'They have sought to block his progression beyond that of station commander, demean, subjugate and belittle him, ignoring him when he raises serious concerns and then adding insult to injury by claiming it is all in his head and sending him for a mental health assessment.' ***
You do seem to have a difficulty in understanding certain things.