Quizzes & Puzzles28 mins ago
Is This Fair Journalism?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It was another appalling piece of misjudgement, and really could not have come at a worse time for the mail.
If the Mail wants to try and present itself as a defender of a free press, then invading private memorials to obtain reaction about one of its attack campaigns is really not the way to go about it.
the well-used phrase 'Fire ... crowded theatre' comes to mind - again!
If the Mail wants to try and present itself as a defender of a free press, then invading private memorials to obtain reaction about one of its attack campaigns is really not the way to go about it.
the well-used phrase 'Fire ... crowded theatre' comes to mind - again!
I really cannot undertsand the timing and why they chose to 'report' (I use the term very loosely) on this non-story knowing it would cause havoc and detract from the Tory party conference.
They've been roundly condemned by the hierarchy of all political parties (bar the one village idiot whose wife has a vested interest in the rag), Dacre can't even face the music himself but sends one of his minnions and they have to remove a very offensive picture form their website.
It was as well planned, executed but as successful as Operation Barbarossa!
They've been roundly condemned by the hierarchy of all political parties (bar the one village idiot whose wife has a vested interest in the rag), Dacre can't even face the music himself but sends one of his minnions and they have to remove a very offensive picture form their website.
It was as well planned, executed but as successful as Operation Barbarossa!
Yes - I'll bet they have
The DM was trying to spin Milliband's outrage as a wannebe tyrant attempting to muzzle the press
Having two of it's journalists do this totally undermines its argument and demonstrates that allowing journalists to regulate themselves is like putting the Kray's in charge of the Police
The DM was trying to spin Milliband's outrage as a wannebe tyrant attempting to muzzle the press
Having two of it's journalists do this totally undermines its argument and demonstrates that allowing journalists to regulate themselves is like putting the Kray's in charge of the Police
this is the Mail on Sunday, not the Daily Mail - sister papers but separate operations and separate editors. The MoS editor used to edit The Tatler and has always seemed to me a bit more couth than his opposite number on the daily (or maybe I'm just a mug). He's responded appropriately, apologising promptly and suspending the two journos.
He might of course have known in advance that the gatecrashing was going to happen, but most likely not; editors don't handle the day-to-day activities of their journalists.
But as jake says, this undermines the corporate case for self-regulation.
He might of course have known in advance that the gatecrashing was going to happen, but most likely not; editors don't handle the day-to-day activities of their journalists.
But as jake says, this undermines the corporate case for self-regulation.
lengthy piece about it here if you want to put your feet up with a pipe and a glass of whisky
http:// www.the guardia n.com/m edia/20 13/oct/ 03/mail -on-sun day-ten sions-g reig-da cre-mil iband
http://