i have read that twice and still not sure i understand. They are saying essentially you have an independent Scottish armed forces, but the cost would fall to the taxpayer, how about all the Scots who serve in England and all the English who serve in Scotland or Scottish regiments, am i missing the point, plot...
Wouldn't be the first time a country decided "warmongering" military spending could be better spent on services to the people, and then got caught out desperately trying to build a force when a conflict looked imminent. I don't know how the finances would work out, but for sure there would be a separation of expenses along with all the other splits.
our military won't want to be split along ethnic lines, after all that is what they are advocating, English, Scots, what about those who have Scottish/English blood, family, or are descended from English, or from Scots, have they really thought this through.
I guess if the French accept any nationality onto their Foreign Legion, we could still have a foreign legion in the UK full of outsiders like the Scots :-)
our military is a British fighting force, not Scotland, Wales, Ireland, England, it will stay that way, and besides i don't think they will get their independence and even if they do, how would having a Scottish armed forces help them if they are invaded and the rest don't help?
What would be Scotland's responsibilities be to the UN and all its agencies and to Nato . There are hundreds of organisations under the UK umbrella .
It will cost the Scots a fortune to join and run them separately. I think if I was starting a new business I would make sure I was on this side of the border.
The Scottish side of my family were/are all in Scottish regiments and served all over the world . I know they would not join a home based Scottish Dads Army. I certainly wouldn't.
The Scottish regiments have already been rebranded as part of the British military shakeup - names of ancestral regiments important to the Scots have been merged into a bland generic name.