ChatterBank1 min ago
Regrest - Until The Next Time
8 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.There has to have been some kind of cultural shift within Social Services, judging from some of the commentary in that article.
Despite reservations from Doctors who had examined the child, despite his own testimony and that of his sibling, Social Services, it would seem, chose to ignore this evidence in favour of the mothers story that the child was clumsy and "ran into things".
And, referring back to other, previous high profile cases discussed here, Social Services in other cases, like Baby P and the Climbie case, appear to have ignored the evidence of multiple bruises or injuries as evidence of abuse in favour of believing the lies from the mother of boisterous or clumsy behaviour by the child.
One cannot help but think that Social Services are so wedded to the idea that it is better to "keep a family" together that nothing short of a dead body will convince them otherwise...
Despite reservations from Doctors who had examined the child, despite his own testimony and that of his sibling, Social Services, it would seem, chose to ignore this evidence in favour of the mothers story that the child was clumsy and "ran into things".
And, referring back to other, previous high profile cases discussed here, Social Services in other cases, like Baby P and the Climbie case, appear to have ignored the evidence of multiple bruises or injuries as evidence of abuse in favour of believing the lies from the mother of boisterous or clumsy behaviour by the child.
One cannot help but think that Social Services are so wedded to the idea that it is better to "keep a family" together that nothing short of a dead body will convince them otherwise...
// Despite a paediatrician expressing "strong concern" he was being beaten, police found no cause for concern at the house and stopped investigating. //
Yes sqad. In this instance the medics alerted the Police who were not concerned, so the local authorities could do nothing.
In the Baby P case, the GP was useless.
Yes sqad. In this instance the medics alerted the Police who were not concerned, so the local authorities could do nothing.
In the Baby P case, the GP was useless.
I understand that for some of the home visits Social Services often request the accompaniment of a police officer because some of the areas and some of the families involved are intimidating.
I am sure I read somewhere that there was a feeling that a better balance between women and men were employed within the field, since it is Social Services is predominantly staffed with women and it was felt that men might be less easily intimidated - But having seen some of those places, I am not so sure that would be a cure. I think most men might be intimidated too :)
I am sure I read somewhere that there was a feeling that a better balance between women and men were employed within the field, since it is Social Services is predominantly staffed with women and it was felt that men might be less easily intimidated - But having seen some of those places, I am not so sure that would be a cure. I think most men might be intimidated too :)
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.