Sports Personality Of The Year...
Film, Media & TV6 mins ago
Brooks / Coulsion Trial: Beans Getting Spilled!
64 Answers
http://
Rather apt that skeletons in the cupboard are being revealed on Hallowe'en!
Rather apt that skeletons in the cupboard are being revealed on Hallowe'en!
Answers
Petard is a penny banger (firework)
as in hoist with one's own petard is letting of a banger too near and not throwing it into a crowd of younger kids.
Peter is fart - eek I mean pettay !
I think fart is pete (/pet/) but I will check.
Le petomane (played by Leonardd Rossiter well when he was alive) was awarded a British honour/medal which the British Consul then had to claw back when QV said - I am not amused
as in hoist with one's own petard is letting of a banger too near and not throwing it into a crowd of younger kids.
Peter is fart - eek I mean pettay !
I think fart is pete (/pet/) but I will check.
Le petomane (played by Leonardd Rossiter well when he was alive) was awarded a British honour/medal which the British Consul then had to claw back when QV said - I am not amused
Blimey look at that - I have predicted the Daily Express front page. You should listen to me more you lot. I would have liked more to do the Daily Mail and put AOGz nose out of joint.
RK may not have pressed charges - not so much from noble noble sentiments but more because he didnt want the ... person ....he was in bed with to ..... - Name to come out I mean .
Would she have pleaded provocation, or you can see why I did it ?
and all during that time she was seeking solace with Charlie....
Is anyone following State of Play - the teevee prog ?
RK may not have pressed charges - not so much from noble noble sentiments but more because he didnt want the ... person ....he was in bed with to ..... - Name to come out I mean .
Would she have pleaded provocation, or you can see why I did it ?
and all during that time she was seeking solace with Charlie....
Is anyone following State of Play - the teevee prog ?
I can't understand why these two have been picked out to stand such a lengthy Old Bailey trial for a bit of phone tapping, it is going on in much higher circles, take the recent US v German Chancellor Angela Merkel case.
And has anyone gone on trial for all the NHS scandals, surely those are much worse since many lives have been lost.
And has anyone gone on trial for all the NHS scandals, surely those are much worse since many lives have been lost.
Hi AOG we re clearly both at a loose end
take the recent US v German Chancellor Angela Merkel case.
erm wasnt a case was it ? Did the president go to prison ?
Freddie has gone over why and when they prosecute 2 prongs - enough evidence and in the public interest. I actually am surprised they didnt prosecute sooner - the Police showing amazing reticence of Savile proportions. If only you and I were treated like that when we wee on the street....
I used to read the Daily Mail - when it was a fraud-sheet
take the recent US v German Chancellor Angela Merkel case.
erm wasnt a case was it ? Did the president go to prison ?
Freddie has gone over why and when they prosecute 2 prongs - enough evidence and in the public interest. I actually am surprised they didnt prosecute sooner - the Police showing amazing reticence of Savile proportions. If only you and I were treated like that when we wee on the street....
I used to read the Daily Mail - when it was a fraud-sheet
Hi Peter
When I put the US v German Chancellor Angela Merkel case, I did not mean it was an actual case, it was just a terminology, perhaps in hindsight the wrong one, seeing that it has caused a little confusion, for which I apologise.
Maybe I should have said "the US v German Chancellor Angela Merkel affair"?
Oh dear then perhaps not, as this also gives the wrong impression, I'll just say "the US v German Chancellor Angela Merkel phone listening in accusation" and leave it at that.
When I put the US v German Chancellor Angela Merkel case, I did not mean it was an actual case, it was just a terminology, perhaps in hindsight the wrong one, seeing that it has caused a little confusion, for which I apologise.
Maybe I should have said "the US v German Chancellor Angela Merkel affair"?
Oh dear then perhaps not, as this also gives the wrong impression, I'll just say "the US v German Chancellor Angela Merkel phone listening in accusation" and leave it at that.
AOG
Differences.
Phone hacking (not tapping) is different to the US NSA surveillance because:
The US Government is capturing data from EVERYONE in the interests of national security and to prevent attacks upon US citizens (Apparently).
The tabloids tagetted selected celebrities in the interests of making money for their proprietors by stealing private information.
That is not to say the US Governments actions are legal or right, just that the two are not really comparable.
Why prosecute phone hackers and not hospital administrators?
I agree with you, hospital staff should be charged. But because they haven't, doesn't mean a totally different and unconnected crime should also not be prosecuted. The Hackers are alledged to have broken the law, so a court hearing to prove guilt or innocence is only right.
Differences.
Phone hacking (not tapping) is different to the US NSA surveillance because:
The US Government is capturing data from EVERYONE in the interests of national security and to prevent attacks upon US citizens (Apparently).
The tabloids tagetted selected celebrities in the interests of making money for their proprietors by stealing private information.
That is not to say the US Governments actions are legal or right, just that the two are not really comparable.
Why prosecute phone hackers and not hospital administrators?
I agree with you, hospital staff should be charged. But because they haven't, doesn't mean a totally different and unconnected crime should also not be prosecuted. The Hackers are alledged to have broken the law, so a court hearing to prove guilt or innocence is only right.
Tom Watson MP was in the court this week seemingly.
He will have a part to play in this case I'm sure but no doubt he was there as an observer - that's what I assumed.
He must be feeling good though and he was probably staring straight at them all in the dock.
What I found interesting is that Rebecca Brookes has dyed her hair a much darker shade of red. I'm wondering if she has been advised to do this.
The court must look pretty weird. One of the reporters was saying that there are so many wigs in court that it looks like the court is full of sheep! Its a pity they dont let cameras in - I'd love to see it..
He will have a part to play in this case I'm sure but no doubt he was there as an observer - that's what I assumed.
He must be feeling good though and he was probably staring straight at them all in the dock.
What I found interesting is that Rebecca Brookes has dyed her hair a much darker shade of red. I'm wondering if she has been advised to do this.
The court must look pretty weird. One of the reporters was saying that there are so many wigs in court that it looks like the court is full of sheep! Its a pity they dont let cameras in - I'd love to see it..
Given the evidence guilty pleas and evidence already presented I'll be surprised if this trial goes the distance expected.
http://
I'm amazed that Coulson hasn't pleaded guilty already after today, which was pretty damning. The words "Do his phone" will become his epitaph. Further revelations of a similar nature are surely in the pipeline and IMHO it will get to the point where they'll decide to no longer continue the charade.
Just a hunch though!
http://
I'm amazed that Coulson hasn't pleaded guilty already after today, which was pretty damning. The words "Do his phone" will become his epitaph. Further revelations of a similar nature are surely in the pipeline and IMHO it will get to the point where they'll decide to no longer continue the charade.
Just a hunch though!
What is opened by the Crown and what the evidence turns out to be are often very different. The rule is "Open low, finish high" when prosecuting, because of that; open he case with as little as possible, avoiding quotes from witnesses who aren't policemen; policemen read from notes; but finish with a strong closing speech, when you know how the evidence, including the defendant's, has gone. The statement "Do his phone" may never emerge in evidence, but you can bet whoever says they heard it will be encouraged to read their witness statement before giving evidence !
Latest Posts
Quizzes & Puzzles7 mins ago
Body & Soul16 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles19 mins ago
Are Labour Preparing To Dump The P M ?
News19 mins ago
Body & Soul29 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.