Donate SIGN UP

Am I Being Narrow Minded??

Avatar Image
jd_1984 | 07:24 Mon 04th Nov 2013 | News
26 Answers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24799675

But, why do these people get anonymity orders imposed. Now he has slipped through the net, we all worry to what end? If there is reasonable doubt as to this persons activities in the first place, should we know?
Or is it against his human rights, innocent unitl proven guilty, racist to even mention this etc etc!!!
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 26rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by jd_1984. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
how do they know its him leaving the mosque?
//why do these people get anonymity orders imposed.//

Good question. I have no idea - and I don't think you're being narrow minded.
Anonymity is probably given as the Terrorism prevention and investigation measures notices placed upon them are not part of the criminal justice system (no trial, no convictions etc) - if they have not been convicted of a crime then it would seem quite a detriment to have your movement restricted and your name published
It's still odd though, Iggy. If someone is subject to restrictions under anti-terrorism law, why should this be secret information? It is a fact. And the name of the person being known would help in finding them if they breached the order.
Question Author
There is a Sex Offenders register, public knowledge.
But I suppose the difference is it contains "offenders" not people of suspicion or under observation. It just worries me that we are made aware of a suspected terrorist now, because he has escaped police observation?!
//how do they know its him leaving the mosque? //

Probably have camera's on the entrances/exits. Count them in, count them out.

Terroirst goes in, never comes out. Burka wearer never goes in but does come out. Not rocket science.

You have to wonder why he was in our country in the first place. Is Somalia part of the EU now?

Just out of interest, anyone know if he is on benefits? If not how does he pay his way?
Surprised no one has yet mentioned the Burka, surely in the interests of national security, it is now time that Britain banned the wearing of this ridiculous garment.
He doesn't seem very anonymous to me.

Incidentally only the other day I passed a figure in a full burkah (on Portsmouth station) who seemed to be walking with a remarkably masculine-looking gait.
/// Then there's the wider question: How will police and MI5 monitor suspects when their TPims expire after the maximum two years? ///

Easily solved, kick them out of the country when first suspected.
You'd think innocent transvestites would opt for a more attractive garb than a burkha.
Recently there was a thread about a person wearing a Nazi uniform in a supermarket, yet some don't seem to are about the Burka being worn all around Britain, surely this could turn out to be more of a threat than an historical uniform?
I find it surprising that this man was under surveillance by our highly respected, highly trained and highly paid security forces yet he managed to evade them by putting a bag on his head,
I hope that terrorists don't learn how to hide around corners or we'll all be doomed.
-- answer removed --
This page is by the Government's independent reviewer or Terrorist legislation

https://terrorismlegislationreviewer.independent.gov.uk/tpims-the-recent-abscond/

It seems he was under an annonimity order for his own protection.

It might not be unreasonable to suspect that this might be due to some collaboration with security forces

Al-Shabab,doesn't after all have a strong history of activities outside of Africa and has seen a number of defections.

I think you are being a little narrow minded and should consider other possibilities - like the possibility that MI6 just lost an informer!
chrisgel

/// I find it surprising that this man was under surveillance by our highly respected, highly trained and highly paid security forces yet he managed to evade them by putting a bag on his head, ///

So he enters a mosque, would you have stopped him from doing this?

Then someone emerges from the mosque, wearing a Burka, should our "highly respected, highly trained and highly paid security forces" gone up to that person and demanded them to remove the said garment?

Surely a breach of their 'Human Rights'?
A terrorist hiding in a burka in London; anyone so covered should be checked out till he is found, as its in our interest & safety. Burka clad objecters should be removed from the public domain.

I DEMAND the right to check every face beside me !

They better be well balanced when passing my big feet ;)
Jordyboy9

AOG or OG would have sufficed, both have a less offensive sound than 'old git'.
AOG - /So he enters a mosque, would you have stopped him from doing this?/

Really! So all you have to do to dodge our security forces is to enter a building?
Perhaps someone could have followed him inside to keep an eye on him?

chrisgel

/// Really! So all you have to do to dodge our security forces is to enter a building?
Perhaps someone could have followed him inside to keep an eye on him? ///

Surely we do not have the resources or even the man power to individually 'tail' each and every terrorist suspect 24/7.
AOG /Surely we do not have the resources or even the man power to individually 'tail' each and every terrorist suspect 24/7./

Then why bother at all?

1 to 20 of 26rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Am I Being Narrow Minded??

Answer Question >>