Donate SIGN UP

How Can This Be Classed As Careless Driving?

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 15:10 Wed 22nd Jan 2014 | News
52 Answers
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2543804/Motorist-facing-court-driving-puddle-drenching-group-primary-school-children-parents.html

If he had suddenly reduced speed a vehicle travelling behind could have run into the back of him, and suddenly swerving into the centre of the road would have been equally dangerous.

Perhaps it is the council who should be prosecuted for the poor road condition or blocked drains that created the 'puddle', and why is an officer of the law allowed to pose with a member of the public at such a 'serious' time?
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 52rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
In all seriousness it's not ridiculous. The driver was in his nice warm DRY car and just couldn't be bothered to slow down to avoid soaking a load of people.
A tempest in a teapot, or a storm in a teacup, comes to mind.
no where does it mention speeding, 20mph is plenty to cause a splash. I can just imagine the whinning on here if the driver swerved and hit an on comming car.
Swerving is dangerous and not what has been suggested.
Whilst I cannot condone screaming obscenities or see the need for crying ones eyes out it is not much fun getting a child to school wet through to their undies.

Yes, you've guessed it, it has happened to me.
//I was yelling obscenities at the driver.**//


Nice 'lady'

Never heard so much rubbish. Sounds more like a build up for a load of compo. Just watch this space.
Yes, Mamyalynne; it's happened to us all I'm sure. It happened to me numerous times as a kid going to school in the dampish UK, and I didn't dissolve: I'm still as sweet as ever:)
Are you serious?? You honestly think they will bring a group case for compensation ??

Never in the memory........
When I walk on the pavement I look for puddles and make sure I get past them whilst no cars are comming. So if anyone is at fault it's the parents. I think YMB has nailed it, stand by for the compo claims!
As am I Stewey - not twitter and bisted yet.
Won't happen.
They could call the class action "Watergate".
It is "driving without reasonable consideration". Driving through a puddle thereby splashing pedestrians has , literally, been a textbook example of the offence; Wilkinson's "Road Traffic Law" was citing it over 40 years ago.

The rest of your post has 'if' and 'perhaps', neither of which apply to the reported case. If they were part of it, perhaps the driver will not be prosecuted or perhaps the driver will have a defence.
Tora, so you think it is perfectly acceptable to drive without care anyone else, regardless of the consequences they cause?
AOG

It is careless.

If you drive through a large puddle at speed, your steering is adversely affected. For a moment or two, the steering system will fight because your nearside wheels will have a different traction than your offside wheels.

To deliberately drive at speed through water in a busy urban area can be construed as 'careless'

Alternatively...

The police just needed a convenient crime to hang on this driver, and careless driving simply fit the bill, because unfortunately, we don't have a Being A Git Act on the statute books.
did I say that HC?
it was a 20 limit and no one has mentioned speeding in the article. So I'd say he was not doing more than 20 or we'd have the speed evangelists on here calling for his gonads in the blender. Hardly "at speed" SP!
AOG - "Then if he was with a police car on his tail would have been the more serious offence and surely he would have been charged with that offence."

The report doesn't say that the police car was 'on his tail', it said that the police car was the next vehicle to pass along the road - the offending car could have been out of sight by then.

I have driven for forty-two years in all sorts of conditions, I have never splashed a pedestrian, ever - it is quite easy to slow down if you are driving at an appropriate speed for rain in a built-up area.

No one is suggesting the drive should slam on his breaks, or do a Starskey-and-Hutch style swerve, just slow down and pass through the puddle slowly - it's simple courtesy.

Failing to be aware of conditions and other road users is Careless Driving, so the offender is - as the saying goes - bang to rights.
You can easily aquaplane at 20mph which could cause a catastrophic accident.
Why didn't he just slow down ?

21 to 40 of 52rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

How Can This Be Classed As Careless Driving?

Answer Question >>