Daily Mail? Daily Pervert!

[joggerjayne]

We all know that you don't have to DO anything to be featured in the Daily Mail. You just have to wear a short skirt, or show some cleavage. Or, the Holy Grail of Daily Mail journalism ... a nipple outline.

The latest victim of the Daily Pervert is Christina Milan, who attracted the attention of the Mail's serious front line journalists by showing a bit of her pants.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2546240/Christina-Milian-suffers-wardrobe-malfunction-backless-dress-exposes-g-string.html

[pixie373]

"woman wears g-string". Excellent journalism!

[Gromit]

Historical events on the sidebar of shame.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/tomphillips/the-history-of-the-world-according-to-the-daily-mail-sidebar

[Peaspeculiars]

...and it didn't even lead into anything newsworthy following the headline. I imagine the 'dancing with the stars' producers will be glad of the publicity though.

[joggerjayne]

LOL at that, Gromit

[Peter Pedant]

Blimey - AOG's fave publication is a bit t+ts orientated innit

should that be AOG's fave pubication ?

[Sqad]

My goodness:

Women are now dressing in women's clothes and men photographed in men's clothing...........certainly a good read there.

I found it quite titivating.

[youngmafbog]

Got to get the blood pumping through the blue veins.

Nice one Gromit.

[Peter Pedant]

I thought the "grab-shot" of the fella grabbing his w+llie
or perhaps wishing he has one -
was due to their deteminatio to satisfy all buyers of the paper

[joggerjayne]

I'm tempted to think that most of the male staff at the Daily Pervert spend much of the day furtively touching their own willies.

While waiting for the copy for the Femail section of the paper, lol

Why do they bother with the Femail section, seriously? Does it help them to justify all their pervy tit chasing features?

:0)

[Cloverjo]

She "flaunted her toned pins". How dare she? Not even a bit of cellulite for any nasty journo to pick up on!
So it has to be the g string they point out.

[joggerjayne]

"flaunted"

As in ... failed to completely cover them up???

[andy-hughes]

The Mail on-line has a side-bar which is virtually devoted to items like this - they love 'toned pins', 'bikini bodies' and all that guff.

Best to ignore it.

[Cloverjo]

I can't bear those sites and magazines that point out tiny, slightly less beautiful bits, like a little bit of flab, sweat patch or hairy armpit. Any journalist who writes these articles should publish a full-length, untouched photo of themselves alongside them.
I do generally ignore them.

[FredPuli43]

In an earlier thread, I did ask AOG about the 'sidebar of shame'. He said that it was a separate section, akin to the showbiz section,which was for those interested in such matters. He did not, it appears, bother with it, not having those interests. I always look at it when on the site; it makes a change to have a report in the Mail which is accurate in all ways.

[joggerjayne]

// Any journalist who writes these articles should publish a full-length, untouched photo of themselves alongside them // ... earns Best Answer

[Budlet]

I read - sorry 'look at' - this trash every morning when having my breakfast. It is just the worst excuse for journalism ever. It's fine if you want to know about the Kardashians, Abbey Clancy (she is the new favourite at the moment) or other Z list celebs 'flashing their pins' or posing at an awards ceremony.

[joggerjayne]

At least with the Winter Olympics coming up, the Mail will have fewer opportunities to get photos of ladies' bits.

You won't find top skiers like Lindsey Vonn doing any of this "flaunting" nonsense.

http://maxcdn.fooyoh.com/files/attach/images/3004/997/588/004/lindsey_vonn_sports_illustrated_february_2010_11.jpg

Err ...

[FredPuli43]

What is the target readership for this sidebar? I believe it is the women.

[jno]

female readers are notoriously tut-tutty about other women's flaws. Publish a story about the breakup of Francois Hollande's relationship and male readers will just yawn.

[sp1814]

JJ

Well, at least Christina Milian is an adult.

Unlike this eight year old (yes, eight, not eighteen) that the paper leered over in an article this time last year.

How many of us would refer to an eight year old child as a...'leggy beauty'?

http://www.themediablog.co.uk/the-media-blog/2013/01/daily-mail-turns-the-creepiness-up-a-notch.html