Body & Soul0 min ago
Was Gone With The Wind Racist?
84 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.not for its time, it might be considered so now, but Margaret Mitchell who wrote the book, showed a south in decline, the idea of gentility of the south was going and then gone, plantations were a fact of life, and slaves were a part of that, in pretty much the same way that 12 years a slave shows the reality, harsh but true.
// Many of our ancestors were not only enslaved, but also brutally killed in the arena.
You sure you're not making that up? //
What? We're slaves not made to fight in the gladiator arena ??
(Googles)
"the first gladiators were slaves who were made to fight to the death"
"Most gladiators were prisoners of war, or slaves bought for the purpose"
"The Gladiators came from criminals, prisoners of war or slaves"
"In general, gladiators were condemned criminals, prisoners of war, or slaves"
Etc.
You sure you're not making that up? //
What? We're slaves not made to fight in the gladiator arena ??
(Googles)
"the first gladiators were slaves who were made to fight to the death"
"Most gladiators were prisoners of war, or slaves bought for the purpose"
"The Gladiators came from criminals, prisoners of war or slaves"
"In general, gladiators were condemned criminals, prisoners of war, or slaves"
Etc.
-- answer removed --
andy - with respect, GWTW was made in 1939, not 1909. It's true the civil rights movement as we know it wasn't around, but the NAACP had been fighting all century to end discrimination against African Americans, and slavery had long since been regarded as abhorrent. Politically, GWTW was widely seen as a throwback even then.
It was also the year of Stagecoach, so Westerns weren't that primitive any more either!
It was also the year of Stagecoach, so Westerns weren't that primitive any more either!
"Our Latin conquerors benefited enormously from enslaving us" ...
http:// www.the week.co .uk/pol itics/2 8175/ro me-must -apolog ise-ens laving- britain
http://
Our major export, apart from hunting dogs, was slaves for Rome ...
http:// www.the week.co .uk/281 81/brit ons-wer e-slave s-too
http://
Not sure if the statistics are all that detailed, jno. I think they misplaced the floppy disc.
But I suppose it's possible that the Romans just took a small handful of slaves, and went away and left us in peace.
Although the suggestion that "Britain's major export was slaves for Rome" is another possible view.
But I suppose it's possible that the Romans just took a small handful of slaves, and went away and left us in peace.
Although the suggestion that "Britain's major export was slaves for Rome" is another possible view.
It was a product of its time and reflected the society that produced it which was still (in many States) practising segregation and authorised murder.
It also glamorises a society that was built and maintained by slavery
So not a very suitable theme for a Ball in 2014
Why not a Holocaust Ball, or Cambodian Killing Fields Bop?
It also glamorises a society that was built and maintained by slavery
So not a very suitable theme for a Ball in 2014
Why not a Holocaust Ball, or Cambodian Killing Fields Bop?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.