Comments like this say it all, coming from a left wing rag
it costs them £196 to conduct the background checks required to ensure shotguns are issued only to the kind of dangerous lunatics who use them for mowing down pheasants, rather than to the common or garden variety.
//A few days after it was revealed that an NHS group is considering charging patients for the crutches, walking sticks and neck braces it issues, we discovered that David Cameron has intervened to keep the cost of gun licences frozen at £50: a price that hasn't changed since 2001.//
Well he's got one eye on the coming election - so he has to keep certain sections of community sweet
Do you think its right for the land owners (who aren't poor) to have increased subsidies on the land they own? I never realised that a shotgun license was that cheap. Is it paid yearly.
Was this story printed in the right wing press?
Many types of habitat these days attract subsidies (wetlands, heathlands etc) in order to preserve them for the species which require those habitats to survive. The acreages of heather that exist on moors also used for grouse shoots are one of those endangered habitats therefore are as entitled to subsidies as anywhere else. This author has chosen to make the link with wealthy people to further his own agenda.
Shotgun licences are renewed every 5 years, at one time they were 2/6d. They are only expensive to administer because of the time consuming and (largely) unnecessary repetition of checks for each renewal.
The vast majority of shotgun certificate holders are neither wealthy nor landed but middle or low income people who enjoy clay shooting or who use shotguns for their work or leisure in the country.
They check your cabinets and house security, serial numbers of guns, they can contact your GP if there is any suggestion of a relevant ailment.
Some forces are more stringent than others and some enquiry officers are more 'jobsworth' than others......