Spam & Scams3 mins ago
Female Football Fans Found Guilty Of Ripping Up The Koran.
66 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-26 18005/T wo-fema le-foot ball-fa ns-ripp ed-page s-Koran -throwi ng-air- like-co nfetti- chantin g-racis t-songs -Muslim s.html
Since there are many on AnswerBank who admit to being none believers in religion ie Atheists etc, can they now state whether or not these two women should have been prosecuted for ripping up a religious book?
Since there are many on AnswerBank who admit to being none believers in religion ie Atheists etc, can they now state whether or not these two women should have been prosecuted for ripping up a religious book?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.naomi; //Ah, and there's me forgetting that whilst we can think what we like about most things, we have to respect religion. Silly me//
It isn't necessarily about respecting religions, it's about respecting the feelings of your fellow man (and woman).
Also[previously you said //Religious books don't merit greater respect than any other book// Perhaps you are being purposely provocative (it has been known :), but you can't be seriously saying that the Upanishads, a Caxton Holy Bible or one of those beautiful hand written Korans, deserve no more respect than say a copy of a Jeffrey Archer novel, are you?
It isn't necessarily about respecting religions, it's about respecting the feelings of your fellow man (and woman).
Also[previously you said //Religious books don't merit greater respect than any other book// Perhaps you are being purposely provocative (it has been known :), but you can't be seriously saying that the Upanishads, a Caxton Holy Bible or one of those beautiful hand written Korans, deserve no more respect than say a copy of a Jeffrey Archer novel, are you?
the books themselves deserve no respect whatsoever
i would happily see every single one of them burnt - and couldnt care less who doesn't like it.
just because an inanimate object is important to one person does not give them the right to expect every other people to give it the same reverence - especially an object that it is actually utterly abhorrent and offensive to many.
the only issue with this situation is that these 2 women were being deliberatory provocative and trying to cause trouble, which in itself deserves some punishment.
but as for the actual issue of the book, the only true crime they committed in ripping it up, is one of littering ...
i would happily see every single one of them burnt - and couldnt care less who doesn't like it.
just because an inanimate object is important to one person does not give them the right to expect every other people to give it the same reverence - especially an object that it is actually utterly abhorrent and offensive to many.
the only issue with this situation is that these 2 women were being deliberatory provocative and trying to cause trouble, which in itself deserves some punishment.
but as for the actual issue of the book, the only true crime they committed in ripping it up, is one of littering ...
I've organised Bible-burning parties, where any other religious texts that we could get hold of were also thrown into the flames and that has certainly included several dozen copies of the Qur'an. So I've certainly no objection to people ripping it to shreds.
However even I can understand that football clubs won't want one group of supporters making things unpleasant for other supporters.
However even I can understand that football clubs won't want one group of supporters making things unpleasant for other supporters.
khandro - ive said it a few times now - not sure what bit of it you do not understand
yes i think ALL religious texts should be burnt. I am against religion in EVERY way. I understand enough about it to have come to that conclusion.
at no point was i "arrogant enough to say that you wish to set yourself up as an arbiter of what others should study and practise"
i have said what I would like to happen.
yes i think ALL religious texts should be burnt. I am against religion in EVERY way. I understand enough about it to have come to that conclusion.
at no point was i "arrogant enough to say that you wish to set yourself up as an arbiter of what others should study and practise"
i have said what I would like to happen.
Aside from the perceived deliberate provocation in the act, it is worth bearing in mind that to Muslims, the Koran is a sacred object and this behaviour is seen as serious disrespect of their faith - which was probably the inention.
The intelligence levels of the defendents are shown in their attempted defence - I didn't know what it was, so i tore it up. Yeah, right!
As a public order offence, which this was, i think they were sentenced appropriately - my atheism is not an issue with that view.
The intelligence levels of the defendents are shown in their attempted defence - I didn't know what it was, so i tore it up. Yeah, right!
As a public order offence, which this was, i think they were sentenced appropriately - my atheism is not an issue with that view.
joko; I have over many years built up a collection of books dealing with all aspects of religion ( everything from Atheism to Zoroastrianism:-). I haven't counted, but I would guess I might have well over 50 volumes. From where I am sitting now, I look up at one shelf and can see a book called, 'Psycho-cosmic Symbolism of the Buddhist Stupa.' by Lama Anagarika Govinda.
Not only am I sure you haven't read it, you wouldn't want to read it, and quite honestly without more knowledge you wouldn't understand it anyway. Yet along with all my other books you say how you would like to see them burnt, thereby preventing anyone else from reading them. If that isn't acting as an arbiter of what others can read and study and a demonstration of supreme arrogance, I wonder what is?
Not only am I sure you haven't read it, you wouldn't want to read it, and quite honestly without more knowledge you wouldn't understand it anyway. Yet along with all my other books you say how you would like to see them burnt, thereby preventing anyone else from reading them. If that isn't acting as an arbiter of what others can read and study and a demonstration of supreme arrogance, I wonder what is?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.