News2 mins ago
What A Repulsive Person!! He Thinks All Babies Detected As Having Downes Syndrome Or Spina Bifida Should Be Aborted.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by RATTER15. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Yes the article is from 2012, why and who has brought it to the fore now? Yet more dirty tricks from the main parties against UKIP is it? If so it will continue now until the GE, obviously they think they pose a threat but IMO maybe it will backfire and people will not like them being treated as the underdog!
/// When we lived in Devon we used to occasionally visit McDonalds, they employed a lovely lad with Downes Syndrome, he was a real asset them. He would clean the floors and take meals to tables, that's what he loved to do, he was very polite and friendly and had won awards from McDonalds for his friendly service. He would often sit down and have a chat with the kids, everybody loved him. ///
Reading through this I immediately thought how patronising this was, already it shows that a person who happens to be Downes Syndrome is a person who was good enough to clean floors and take meals to tables, and then take time to chat with the kids.
It is almost on the level of talking down and shouting in a slow voice to someone in a wheel chair.
Regarding Babies detected as having Downes Syndrome or Spina Bifidia being aborted, I wonder how many of those showing complete horror at the suggestion, would themselves choose to have an abortion if they found that their expected baby had these conditions?
Reading through this I immediately thought how patronising this was, already it shows that a person who happens to be Downes Syndrome is a person who was good enough to clean floors and take meals to tables, and then take time to chat with the kids.
It is almost on the level of talking down and shouting in a slow voice to someone in a wheel chair.
Regarding Babies detected as having Downes Syndrome or Spina Bifidia being aborted, I wonder how many of those showing complete horror at the suggestion, would themselves choose to have an abortion if they found that their expected baby had these conditions?
AOG
\\\Regarding Babies detected as having Downes Syndrome or Spina Bifidia being aborted, I wonder how many of those showing complete horror at the suggestion, would themselves choose to have an abortion if they found that their expected baby had these conditions?\\
Indeed or any other genetic structural abnormality.
However i feel that most of the "disgusted" posters are "balking" at the word, COMPULSORY rather than an informed personal decision.
\\\Regarding Babies detected as having Downes Syndrome or Spina Bifidia being aborted, I wonder how many of those showing complete horror at the suggestion, would themselves choose to have an abortion if they found that their expected baby had these conditions?\\
Indeed or any other genetic structural abnormality.
However i feel that most of the "disgusted" posters are "balking" at the word, COMPULSORY rather than an informed personal decision.
It is the ' compulsary' aspect I am horrified about as Sqad says, but to address your question AOG, no I would not have an abortion if I discovered I was carrying a child with either Spina Bifida or Downs syndrome. The only time I would consider that is if I was told that the child would be in terrible pain and have no quality of life, which is untrue for both of those conditions generally.
AOG - "/// When we lived in Devon we used to occasionally visit McDonalds, they employed a lovely lad with Downes Syndrome, he was a real asset them. He would clean the floors and take meals to tables, that's what he loved to do, he was very polite and friendly and had won awards from McDonalds for his friendly service. He would often sit down and have a chat with the kids, everybody loved him. ///
Reading through this I immediately thought how patronising this was, already it shows that a person who happens to be Downes Syndrome is a person who was good enough to clean floors and take meals to tables, and then take time to chat with the kids."
I don't think it shows that at all.
It shows that the lad in question was employed in a job that hundreds of able-bodied people do every day - and that he enjoyed his job, and his customer interaction.
The interface you appear to draw from his occupatipon and his condition is conicidental - nothing more. I suggest you are seeing a patronising attitude where none was intended or inferred.
Reading through this I immediately thought how patronising this was, already it shows that a person who happens to be Downes Syndrome is a person who was good enough to clean floors and take meals to tables, and then take time to chat with the kids."
I don't think it shows that at all.
It shows that the lad in question was employed in a job that hundreds of able-bodied people do every day - and that he enjoyed his job, and his customer interaction.
The interface you appear to draw from his occupatipon and his condition is conicidental - nothing more. I suggest you are seeing a patronising attitude where none was intended or inferred.
What a bizarre manifesto.
He goes on to say:
"It should also look into medical treatment for people over the age of 80, which the 66-year-old says is "extraordinarily costly" to the NHS.
I wonder what he means? Should the NHS withhold treatment? Or perhaps have time limits on the elderly?
Is this fair?
Does anyone agree with this?
He goes on to say:
"It should also look into medical treatment for people over the age of 80, which the 66-year-old says is "extraordinarily costly" to the NHS.
I wonder what he means? Should the NHS withhold treatment? Or perhaps have time limits on the elderly?
Is this fair?
Does anyone agree with this?
No, I dont agree with him Mickey.
However, if in the position of having to take on a child like that I must confess I dont really know what I would do. It is easy to sit on the side lines and snipe at those that make a decision but unless you have been in the position you really dont know. One of my daughters is disabled, we love her dearly but believe me it has, and still is sometimes, a real struggle.
This is of course not News at all, just someone trying to sling mud at UKIP and failing miserably.
However, if in the position of having to take on a child like that I must confess I dont really know what I would do. It is easy to sit on the side lines and snipe at those that make a decision but unless you have been in the position you really dont know. One of my daughters is disabled, we love her dearly but believe me it has, and still is sometimes, a real struggle.
This is of course not News at all, just someone trying to sling mud at UKIP and failing miserably.
That's why it's an individual decision, ymb. It does depend how parents can cope. I wouldn't judge somebody for their decision- it's the compulsory part that angers me. Anyway, all that would happen, i think, is that pregnant women would decline tests and scans, just in case- and that might endanger the mother or baby for different reasons.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.