Over here professional sportspeople have been banned from their sport for much lesser sins. It sends a message to other sportspeople and the community at large that that sort of behavior will not be tolerated.
Of course, it is for courts to sentence offenders and for them to serve their sentences. After that they are free to resume their life as they see fit. You cannot drag around people's crimes after they have served their sentence like a perpetual mills tone around their neck.
I don't like the culture of misogyny amongst a lot of footballers but you can hardly stop the man returning to his career- there would be no objection if he was a plumber, it's only fair he should be treated the same.
I'm not sure anyone's job is to be a role model? It's a position other people put them in. Perhaps teachers....but DBS checks will prevent him working anywhere he shouldn't.
It's easy to claim the moral high ground in cases like this. Another way of looking at it is that, if he is indeed guilty of such an awful crime as this, its minimum sentence ought to mean that he is far too old to resume his career by the time he is released.
It's the way of the world sandy.
After all, there have been plenty of convicted murderers and terrorists who have subsequently become politicians and councillors, have there not?
ChillDoubt, the terrorists who went on to have political careers had the support of their communities or they wouldn't have been elected. I can't see convicted rapists having, or deserving, much support.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.