Yes, I recall the flotilla 'attack'.
Turns out that not everything was as it seemed though, was it?:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_flotilla_raid
On 2 August 2010, United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon announced that the U.N. would conduct an investigation of the incident. The report was published on 2 September 2011 after being delayed, reportedly to allow Israel and Turkey to continue reconciliation talks. The report found that the Israeli naval blockade of Gaza was legal, and that there were "serious questions about the conduct, true nature and objectives of the flotilla organizers, particularly IHH". The report also found that Israel's army used excessive force while the flotilla was still in international waters, and concluded that the degree of force used against the Mavi Marmara was "excessive and unreasonable" and that the way Israel treated detained crew members violated international human rights law.
The government of Israel alleged that the flotilla was organized as a provocation or media stunt and that a hard core of about 40 IHH activists were prepared from the beginning for a violent confrontation. The New York Times, in an editorial, said, "At least some of the activists on the lead ship, the Mavi Marmara, were seeking a confrontation – and got one."
So both sides at fault, not just the Israeli's? I recall footage of several soldiers roping onto the ships who were attacked with knives and iron bars as they did so.