Is The Office For Value For Money Poor...
News2 mins ago
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4176988.stm
Does everyone believe this scaremongering rubbish? Big story headlines to scare us but if you actually read the detail !
No best answer has yet been selected by nedflanders. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Climate change is a reality, that is part of the climate cycle of the planet. It is however very little to do with mankind. The Eco wally's mostly do not undersatand the long carbon cycle and therefore think mankind can make a difference to climate by some tenuois carbon mantra's. 97% of carbon at any one time is locked in the Earth systems, mankind can control the other 3%. We should of course pollute less and I'm all for controlling emissions but please can we get away from the ridiuclous notion that mankind can effect climate change.
The earth continually goes through climate change and indeed it has resulted in restructuring life on earth. Watch the excellent National Geographic program "Earth Story" for a good description of what has happenned up to now and for an eye openner on how totally insignificant we are.
Yes and Kyoto will reduce the earths temperature by 0.04�c by 2100 if we acheive it which we wont! Woohoo that will make such a difference! What I am saying jno is that the mass public is ill informed by the scaremongering media and scientists looking for research grants. If we cant predict the weather 2 weeks in advance what chance do we have of predicting it in 100 years time?
If human activity is so inconsequential why when so many of the world's aircraft were grounded after September 11th was there such a sudden significant change in measured temperatures?
You say Kyoto's effect would be 0.04 degrees, in the 3 days post 9-11 there was over a full degree measured, not predicted but measured!
We may not know exactly how our activity changes climate but that is concrete evidence that it does.
http://www.nationalcenter.org/KyotoQuestionsAnswers.html
http://archives.cnn.com/2002/TECH/science/08/07/contrails.climate/
I accept your point jake but this is only a temperature variation not a nett decrease in temperature. If we grounded every aircraft in the world it would not reduce the worlds temperature by 1�C.
The point is that humal activity can have an appreciable affect on climate.
I also would believe nothing that comes out of the National center for public policy research.
Check them out on sourcewatch:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=National_Center_for_Public_Policy_Research
They're not exactly what you'd call impartial
No this was serious work, ironically it actually works in the opposite direction to global warming and is generally known as global dimming. there was a pretty good horizon documentry on it, there is a summary here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2005/01_january/13/horizon.shtml
And yes I can help you to get money out of Nigeria for details see here.
http://www.419eater.com/html/joe_eboh.htm
But you'll have to join my church and paint your chest!
I read the article Jake (the horizon one not the Nigeria one!). The article (as all global warming statements do) uses a lot of use of the words "may" and "could" speculation, speculation and more speculation. The fact is we just dont know what the climate will do. And all our theories are based upon guesses and no scientific fact. Every piece of research that is done on the environment is tainted whether it done for big business or for environmental groups. The media just love the stories that the environmental groups put out as it is easily sellable "global warming catastrophe looms" "severe climate change" sensationalist headlines with no scientific fact behind it ! Global temperatures have been rising for 150years and that is a scientific fact. I have no doubt that we pollute the earth too much but we dont have a clue how much if any we are contributing to this trend.
You really should read the Nigeria one! it's a scream
To a certain extent I agree.
I would say we are pretty clearly in a period of climate change.
I think there is also enough evidence to say that human activity is capable of affecting climate.
What the proportion is is much more difficult.
Trouble is at the moment we are forecasting increasing air transport and population rises etc. and that sure isn't helping.
It's not the sort of issue where we can just turn around to our children in 30 years and say "oops sorry". We do have to take it seriously.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.