How can the above organisation be all for promoting Clinical Excellence when they reject a new drug. Where does the 'Excellence' fit in to that scenario?
Interesting, this word "Excellence", a word that was never used in the NHS until late 1970's. Hospitals suddenly described various departments as "Centres of Excellence" and when one inquired who decided on that accolade, nobody seemed know. NHS is state controlled medicine and NICE is a government body, comprised of eminent men with valuable merit...
Yes, but if it's excellent as a treatment surely they're going against their own ethos? May be they should be called NICEBOIIE NICE But Only If Its Economical.
I think when the costs outweigh the benefits they are right.
As svejk said, £90,000 for an extra six months of life? Not worth it in my opinion unless the person can fund it themselves.
Maybe when the cancer drugs fund stops paying for it we can purloin a little of the money that we give away in foreign aid and help our own citizens for once.
I'm afraid he died about 6 weeks ago 237. How kind of you to remember. It was in a wonderful hospice and he just slipped away pain free (I hope) in the end.
Is £90k "worth it" for a possible extra six months of (good quality?) life?
2 answers
1) if you are the person in question with cancer, Yes
2) if you are a publicly funded body with a finite amount of money to spend on all healthcare for all people, No.
black_cat; my argument is not about the affordability but of a body which is there to promote excellence in clinical care. I just can't reconcile the word 'excellence' and the rejection of a life enhancing drug.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.