ChatterBank0 min ago
Is History Important?
127 Answers
history should be compulsory at GCSE, says Antony Beevor
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/e ducatio n/educa tionnew s/11116 561/Ant ony-Bee vor-his tory-sh ould-be -compul sory-at -GCSE.h tml
is it relevant to today's students?
(btw how many of you didn't get 100% in the quiz?)
http://
is it relevant to today's students?
(btw how many of you didn't get 100% in the quiz?)
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mushroom25. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Sorry, jno I didn't notice that you gave the link to the Co-Belligerent Army.
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/wo rld-eur ope-174 35616
Can the 'Italy didn't switch sides' brigade come back and debate a little more?
http://
Can the 'Italy didn't switch sides' brigade come back and debate a little more?
Yes history is important.
More important than multiple choice quizzes, which are so easy to concoct and yet so misleading.
For example doubtless some people, not really having a clue, might have gone for "Vladimir Lenin" (sic) as the leader of the Soviet Union, whereas if you'd asked them "who was leader of the Soviet Union during WWII?" they'd probably have said "I don't know". So someone would do a survey of the answers and spuriously conclude that x% of people thought that he was, when all it means is that x% guessed wrong :-)
More important than multiple choice quizzes, which are so easy to concoct and yet so misleading.
For example doubtless some people, not really having a clue, might have gone for "Vladimir Lenin" (sic) as the leader of the Soviet Union, whereas if you'd asked them "who was leader of the Soviet Union during WWII?" they'd probably have said "I don't know". So someone would do a survey of the answers and spuriously conclude that x% of people thought that he was, when all it means is that x% guessed wrong :-)