ChatterBank0 min ago
The Final Nail?
24 Answers
http:// news.sk y.com/s tory/13 48171/c legg-li b-dems- would-a sk-rich -to-pay -more-t ax
I thought Clegg was dead in the water before this but surely this will finish the lib-dems off once and for all.
Glegg seems to be pitching for another coalition, but would labour or the Tories risk it? I somehow doubt it.
I thought Clegg was dead in the water before this but surely this will finish the lib-dems off once and for all.
Glegg seems to be pitching for another coalition, but would labour or the Tories risk it? I somehow doubt it.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The problem for Cameron (or his successor) is that if the Conservatives do not have a majority at the election they will have to cave in to the LibDems demands, like they did last time.
UKIPs spectacular by election win this coming Thursday will herald the possibility of a poor general election showing due to UKIP stealing their votes.
UKIPs spectacular by election win this coming Thursday will herald the possibility of a poor general election showing due to UKIP stealing their votes.
It may be too early to write off the Lib Dems yet. I think they can legitimately claim to have had a positive influence on some policies; in particular the raising of the tax threshold is primarily down to them. Even optimistically I'd be surprised if they managed to make gains in 2015; I'd expect to see the LibDems hold maybe 50 seats at most.
Gromit...you are correct in assuming that any progress UKIP makes next May will be at a cost to the Tories, just like this coming Thursday. So it makes the prospect of a Tory outright majority, or a Tory-led coalition even more unlikely. But we mustn't rules out the Libd quite yet. They are still able to come third next May, which may be enough to call the tune again.
Far be it for me to defend the Libs but it must be admitted that they have been successful in stopping the worst of the usual Tory excesses since 2010.
Far be it for me to defend the Libs but it must be admitted that they have been successful in stopping the worst of the usual Tory excesses since 2010.
Mikey, you write, "I can't be asked." I have never understood why anyone would say this rather than the more obviously correct, "I can't be ar$ed."
Saying, 'I can't be asked' is absurd; absolutely anyone can be asked absolutely anything, surely?
On the other hand, the 'ar$ed' version is probablt derived from earlier sayings such as, "I needed his help but he didn't bother his Yabbie." That may, in turn, have come from a more impolite request such as, "Get off your Yabbie and help me with this."
The notion, of course, is that the rear end is central to whatever activity might be involved...and I don't mean that rudely!
Saying, 'I can't be asked' is absurd; absolutely anyone can be asked absolutely anything, surely?
On the other hand, the 'ar$ed' version is probablt derived from earlier sayings such as, "I needed his help but he didn't bother his Yabbie." That may, in turn, have come from a more impolite request such as, "Get off your Yabbie and help me with this."
The notion, of course, is that the rear end is central to whatever activity might be involved...and I don't mean that rudely!