ChatterBank5 mins ago
Farage's New Bezzy Mate. Women Don't Always Mean 'no'. Mmm.
21 Answers
http:// www.the guardia n.com/p olitics /2014/n ov/08/n igel-fa rage-uk ip-euro pe-janu sz-korw in-mikk e
I suppose when you're a fledgling party you have to have a few strange bedfellows. No?
I suppose when you're a fledgling party you have to have a few strange bedfellows. No?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Zacs-Master. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Apologies Zac-Master. I too have failed to respond properly,
I think Farage should offer an immediate clarification either to support or denounce the views of these new partners.
Of course, just because two parties align, doen't mean they support all views held (look at the Coalition partners, for instance).
Perhaps UKIP simply didn't have a large enough pool of potential partners to choose from?
I think Farage should offer an immediate clarification either to support or denounce the views of these new partners.
Of course, just because two parties align, doen't mean they support all views held (look at the Coalition partners, for instance).
Perhaps UKIP simply didn't have a large enough pool of potential partners to choose from?
But it's not news. It's a comment piece. A re-hash of old stories. There's a lot of real news about this morning. Like T. Blair getting £40,000 a month off the biggest troublemakers in the middle-east while masquerading as a peace envoy. The imminent disintegration of the Labour party. You and your fellow anti-ukippers have already had one bite at this when it was news a few months ago. That is why it shouldn't be in the 'news' section. The cross-words are 'in' the papers, lol.
Svejk
There is a tradition on the News section of repeating questions on the News section where new angles emerge from existing sources.
However, in this instance, I believe this a new association (between UKIP and 'interesting' EU partners) and therefore warrants debate.
I mean, you'd hardly want to shut down debate on say, the MOBO awards or the latest activities of Doreen Lawrence, just because someone else had raised a similar question in the past.
There is a tradition on the News section of repeating questions on the News section where new angles emerge from existing sources.
However, in this instance, I believe this a new association (between UKIP and 'interesting' EU partners) and therefore warrants debate.
I mean, you'd hardly want to shut down debate on say, the MOBO awards or the latest activities of Doreen Lawrence, just because someone else had raised a similar question in the past.
Svejk, if you let me have your email address, I'll make sure to ask your permission before posting anything which you (the self appointed Chief Constable of the News section) may not consider news.
Mikey, yes, a strange 'partnership' indeed but maybe MrF is playing his old trick of 'let's see who we outrage / encourage' as a barometer of public feeling so that he can then formulate vote winning policies, although it's hard to see anyone in their right mind who would ally themselves with this individual's views.
Mikey, yes, a strange 'partnership' indeed but maybe MrF is playing his old trick of 'let's see who we outrage / encourage' as a barometer of public feeling so that he can then formulate vote winning policies, although it's hard to see anyone in their right mind who would ally themselves with this individual's views.
Thought there was a bit of deja vu attached to this!
http://
That gets a paragraph here
http://
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.