Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Whitewash.....
as expected

let me guess just like Warsi, theyll be allowed to pay back the filched money in installments from their future expenses claims
The police have no particular fondness for MPs or Lords as the plebgate affair shows, so it'd only be a whitewash if Parliament was investigating itself.

The problem with parliamentary expenses is that the rules are so lax that it's difficult to actually break them.
What a shower and yet more self-inflicted wounds that UKIP can exploit. If I conned my employers out of £13,000, like Hazel Blears, I'd be in prison - not re-elected.
It'll be a whitewash, both houses treat the public purse with contempt. Personallly I'd abolish the whole sorry shower replace them with 100 elected "senators". They can keep their titles if they like so lord and lady muck can still "lord" it over the commoners if it floats their boat but they shouldn't have any sort of say in running the country.

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Whitewash Or A Real Probe?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.