Christmas Tv - Strike Is Back!
Film, Media & TV1 min ago
Jobs For The Boys......and Girl
13 Answers
Answers
1 to 13 of 13
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ChillDoubt. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
She was found not guilty by a Jury.
Apparently she didn't see anything, didn't hear anything and consequently, didn't say anything but I found it incredible she could have worked in a newspaper, where so much crime was committed, by so many people, and yet she was unaware of any of it happening. At the very least, she was the worst Manager in the world, ever, as she allowed it all to happen on her watch.
She is now going back to work for an employer, that allowed all the previous
crimes to happen. Her period in purgatory doesn't seem to have been very long, has it ?
Apparently she didn't see anything, didn't hear anything and consequently, didn't say anything but I found it incredible she could have worked in a newspaper, where so much crime was committed, by so many people, and yet she was unaware of any of it happening. At the very least, she was the worst Manager in the world, ever, as she allowed it all to happen on her watch.
She is now going back to work for an employer, that allowed all the previous
crimes to happen. Her period in purgatory doesn't seem to have been very long, has it ?
mikey - "...but I found it incredible she could have worked in a newspaper, where so much crime was committed, by so many people, and yet she was unaware of any of it happening. At the very least, she was the worst Manager in the world, ever, as she allowed it all to happen on her watch."
What you know, and what you can prove in a court of law are two different things.
"She is now going back to work for an employer, that allowed all the previous crimes to happen."
As far as I am aware, Mr Murdoch was not convicted of any offence either -see above.
"Her period in purgatory doesn't seem to have been very long, has it ?"
I'm not sure that she has had - or deserved - a period in 'purgatory' - she has probably been enjoying the £12 million pay-off she received from Mr Murdoch when she left his employ.
What you know, and what you can prove in a court of law are two different things.
"She is now going back to work for an employer, that allowed all the previous crimes to happen."
As far as I am aware, Mr Murdoch was not convicted of any offence either -see above.
"Her period in purgatory doesn't seem to have been very long, has it ?"
I'm not sure that she has had - or deserved - a period in 'purgatory' - she has probably been enjoying the £12 million pay-off she received from Mr Murdoch when she left his employ.
Andy...Murdoch was the owner of the now defunct NOTW, and everything that occurred, happened during his period of ownership. That is not an opinion....it is a fact. He even said as much when he appeared before the Commons Select Committee, when he remarked that "today is the most humble day of my life"
So everything went on but he didn't know about it and neither did his Editor at the time, Rebekah Brooks. I find that remarkable........in fact I find it incredible.
So everything went on but he didn't know about it and neither did his Editor at the time, Rebekah Brooks. I find that remarkable........in fact I find it incredible.
mikey - "Andy...Murdoch was the owner of the now defunct NOTW, and everything that occurred, happened during his period of ownership. That is not an opinion....it is a fact. He even said as much when he appeared before the Commons Select Committee, when he remarked that "today is the most humble day of my life"
So everything went on but he didn't know about it and neither did his Editor at the time, Rebekah Brooks. I find that remarkable........in fact I find it incredible."
I can only repeat my previous point, knowing that someone is a conniving dishonest thoroughly bad newspaper owner, and that his chief editor has overseen some of the worst skulduggery in the history of the newspaper industry is one thing ... proving it is another.
So everything went on but he didn't know about it and neither did his Editor at the time, Rebekah Brooks. I find that remarkable........in fact I find it incredible."
I can only repeat my previous point, knowing that someone is a conniving dishonest thoroughly bad newspaper owner, and that his chief editor has overseen some of the worst skulduggery in the history of the newspaper industry is one thing ... proving it is another.
Lucky girl !
I think you are in an area that even when one is acquitted of an offence there are still regulators who rub their hands and say do the whole lot again on the balance of probabilities !
Journo sort of dont operate in such a world
I think Murdoch paid for her defence ( £10m sticks in the mind ) and with partrons like that it was likely that she would be re-hired - well hired anew
I think you are in an area that even when one is acquitted of an offence there are still regulators who rub their hands and say do the whole lot again on the balance of probabilities !
Journo sort of dont operate in such a world
I think Murdoch paid for her defence ( £10m sticks in the mind ) and with partrons like that it was likely that she would be re-hired - well hired anew
1 to 13 of 13
