ChatterBank0 min ago
So Now We Must Legally Give Aid To Foriegn Contries??
42 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -politi cs-3180 9075
What is going on in this country? Natiol debt off te scale nd we giving dosh to foriegners! YCMIU!
What is going on in this country? Natiol debt off te scale nd we giving dosh to foriegners! YCMIU!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.No surprise there then, especially from a government who are prepared to spend more on a high speed train than on the defence of this country.
Something else to take into consideration TTT, some of today's foreigners are tomorrow's fellow countrymen, so we have to look after them until we can look after them here.
Something else to take into consideration TTT, some of today's foreigners are tomorrow's fellow countrymen, so we have to look after them until we can look after them here.
Does that mean that this country has to beggar itself to bring it down to the level of those countries worse off. It is highly suspected by the US that this country will fall below the 2% defence budget by 2015 and will be handing out 7% of the overseas budget. At this rate the Indian Army,Navy and Airforce will be better equipped than our own and that is just defence. What about all the NHS requirements which are lacking in this country??
andy-hughes
/// TTT - the amount of money spent on foreign aid is 0.07% of GDP, and it usually comes back in terms of imports and expertise from the countries we help, and if not, as Hopkirk says, the clue is in the word ' 'aid' - it's not a bad thing to help out people on the world who have nothing. ///
Yes all very caring, but the problem is how much of that money actually ends up making a better life for those who need it?
Here are a couple of interesting articles on the subject.
http:// www.spe ctator. co.uk/f eatures /912136 1/why-a id-fail s/
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-20 02319/U K-aid-c ash-hel ped-Afr ican-di ctator- buy-30m -jet.ht ml
/// TTT - the amount of money spent on foreign aid is 0.07% of GDP, and it usually comes back in terms of imports and expertise from the countries we help, and if not, as Hopkirk says, the clue is in the word ' 'aid' - it's not a bad thing to help out people on the world who have nothing. ///
Yes all very caring, but the problem is how much of that money actually ends up making a better life for those who need it?
Here are a couple of interesting articles on the subject.
http://
http://
This 0.7% makes it sound nothing. It's 1billion pounds a month that we borrow(from our grandchildren? We have no prospect of paying back) to give away. It's also more than any other country in the world gives.
Foreign Aid; A scheme for transferring money from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries.
Foreign Aid; A scheme for transferring money from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries.
“Believe it or not there are people worse off than you.”
That’s perfectly true, Hopkirk. There are plenty of people less well off than me and plenty more considerably better off. But’s that’s no justification to shift money in either direction – especially when that money has to be borrowed. Further, as AOG has quickly pointed out, there are many less well off (through no fault of their own) in this country and they should take priority if there’s spare cash sloshing about.
Essentially the UK government is borrowing money to give to foreigners (very often with little or no examination of where it ends up). We are constantly being told that our children and grandchildren are being burdened with debt to sustain the comforts of wealthy older people. Well here’s a way that borrowed sum can be reduced without older people here (wealthy or otherwise) being affected.
All governments feel good about giving away other people’s money. This one has enshrined it in law that 0.7% goes to foreigners. And politicians wonder why UKIP gains such strong support.
That’s perfectly true, Hopkirk. There are plenty of people less well off than me and plenty more considerably better off. But’s that’s no justification to shift money in either direction – especially when that money has to be borrowed. Further, as AOG has quickly pointed out, there are many less well off (through no fault of their own) in this country and they should take priority if there’s spare cash sloshing about.
Essentially the UK government is borrowing money to give to foreigners (very often with little or no examination of where it ends up). We are constantly being told that our children and grandchildren are being burdened with debt to sustain the comforts of wealthy older people. Well here’s a way that borrowed sum can be reduced without older people here (wealthy or otherwise) being affected.
All governments feel good about giving away other people’s money. This one has enshrined it in law that 0.7% goes to foreigners. And politicians wonder why UKIP gains such strong support.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.