News1 min ago
Labour's Prize Hypocrits
29 Answers
Labour's disgraced ex-shadow Minister and member of the Islington set Emily Thornberry (white van man?) has attacked the Toris 'Right to buy Housing Association homes, apparently bought a HA house as a buy to let which is not worth a million quid!!!
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-30 40796/L abour-s -queen- hypocri sy-MP-s neered- white-v an-man- attacks -Tory-r ight-bu y-plan- thought -bought -1milli on-hous ing-ass ociatio n-home- rents-o ut.html
Ed Milliband's Political Adviser pays no tax in Britain on his £300,000 earnings from the Labour Party
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-30 41013/E d-s-adv iser-pa ys-no-t ax-Brit ain-300 -000-sa lary-El ection- masterm ind-adm its-doe sn-t-pa y-days- Labour- announc ed-crac kdown-n on-doms .html
http://
Ed Milliband's Political Adviser pays no tax in Britain on his £300,000 earnings from the Labour Party
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by lindapalmara. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The hypocrisy shown by some of Labour really is quite breathtaking.
When you consider the likes of Harriett Harmon, Ruth Kelly, Diane Abbott and their schooling choices, some of them really are of a mind of 'do as I say not as I do'
I can still remember the absurd Abbott trotting out the line that she couldn't defend the indefenisble - part of her election campaign in the election immediately before she decided to send her son privately was to support local state schools....the clear message it sent was that the kids of the plebs she represented must support the local state schools, but her child was so much better than all of theirs and therefore he simply must go private.
When you consider the likes of Harriett Harmon, Ruth Kelly, Diane Abbott and their schooling choices, some of them really are of a mind of 'do as I say not as I do'
I can still remember the absurd Abbott trotting out the line that she couldn't defend the indefenisble - part of her election campaign in the election immediately before she decided to send her son privately was to support local state schools....the clear message it sent was that the kids of the plebs she represented must support the local state schools, but her child was so much better than all of theirs and therefore he simply must go private.
Okay, let me put it simply. The fact that these people are hypocritical does not mean that they are wrong. It does not mean that their criticisms of RTB are invalid. This is not complicated stuff.
I understand that by the dismal standards of UK politics, saying "Ah-HA!" counts as a valid argument, but... well... it doesn't in reality.
I understand that by the dismal standards of UK politics, saying "Ah-HA!" counts as a valid argument, but... well... it doesn't in reality.
Kromo
The words 'cloud' and 'cuckoo' come to mind when trying to read your posts! As others have said, 'do and I say and not as I do' is hypocritical. Hypocracy can't be defended. How can Thornton criticise the Right to buy when she did it big time not even as her home but as a letting property, now worth £1m.
The words 'cloud' and 'cuckoo' come to mind when trying to read your posts! As others have said, 'do and I say and not as I do' is hypocritical. Hypocracy can't be defended. How can Thornton criticise the Right to buy when she did it big time not even as her home but as a letting property, now worth £1m.
-- answer removed --
Linda
Hypocrisy, indeed, is wrong. But it does not mean that we should ignore the criticisms which these people have made of RTB.
The reason for that is because the case against RTB does not rely on the credibility of Emily Thornberry, or even of the Labour party. It's a bad policy, even if Labour are a bunch of incompetent sh1tlords.
Criticise Labour all you want, it does not make RTB a better policy.
It's really not very complicated.
Hypocrisy, indeed, is wrong. But it does not mean that we should ignore the criticisms which these people have made of RTB.
The reason for that is because the case against RTB does not rely on the credibility of Emily Thornberry, or even of the Labour party. It's a bad policy, even if Labour are a bunch of incompetent sh1tlords.
Criticise Labour all you want, it does not make RTB a better policy.
It's really not very complicated.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.