Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
Hobbit Home Saved From Demolition !
Some will remember this from a previous thread, sometime last year :::
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -wales- south-w est-wal es-3352 8461
Sensible outcome...well done to the Council concerned, for putting common sense before rules.
http://
Sensible outcome...well done to the Council concerned, for putting common sense before rules.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.// Crymych councillor Keith Lewis prompted applause from the public at the meeting on Tuesday when he said there were no local objections to the house and the couple were "ahead of the game in many ways".
But planning officer David Popplewell said the property fell short of the guidance in the Welsh government's One Planet Development (OPD) policy.
But planning officer David Popplewell said the property fell short of the guidance in the Welsh government's One Planet Development (OPD) policy.
OG...if my memory serves me correctly, this case has been going on for a few years now, so I guess all due deliberation has been completed. I appreciate what every is saying over the issue of planning permission, but I think a sensible outcome has been reached here. After all, there were no local objections apparently, and its hardly an eyesore is it ?
The Welsh Government produce a Guide for Planning Applications. Their Primary concern is the ecologic impact of a development.
http:// gov.wal es/docs /desh/p ublicat ions/12 1115cal culator en.pdf
I would have thought its ecological impact would be very small compared to most buildings, because it was build from materials already there, tree, stone etc. the fact that permission has mow been respectively granted probably indicates that the Planning Officer who refused it did so not on the buildings merit, but because he hadn't been consulted.
http://
I would have thought its ecological impact would be very small compared to most buildings, because it was build from materials already there, tree, stone etc. the fact that permission has mow been respectively granted probably indicates that the Planning Officer who refused it did so not on the buildings merit, but because he hadn't been consulted.
Why they should be above the law beats me. So what its an allegedly 'eco' house? Its still a dwelling built without permission. There are plenty of farmers around here desperate to have their children live on the Farm but cannot get permission to build either a single dwelling or convert a barn, I can think of three off hand that have spend thousands trying to prove the need for a worker on site and no one in the local area would object. FWIW I think its a total eyesore and as it passing building regs like all other new dwellings have to -well I don't think so somehow. Someone has got a nice fat brown envelope I think.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.